• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Roxithromycin versus penicillin in the treatment of erysipelas in adults: a comparative study.

作者信息

Bernard P, Plantin P, Roger H, Sassolas B, Villaret E, Legrain V, Roujeau J C, Rezvani Y, Scheimberg A

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, CHU Dupyutren, Limoges, France.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 1992 Aug;127(2):155-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1992.tb08048.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1992.tb08048.x
PMID:1390144
Abstract

A prospective, randomized, multicentre trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of roxithromycin (150 mg b.i.d. orally) and penicillin (2.5 MU x 8 daily intravenously, then 6 MU daily orally) in the treatment of hospitalized adult patients with erysipelas. Seventy-two patients entered the study. Thirty-one patients in the roxithromycin group and 38 patients in the penicillin group completed the trial. The overall efficacy rates (cure without additional antibiotics) were 84% (26/31) in the roxithromycin group and 76% (29/38) in the penicillin group (P = 0.43). No side-effects were observed in the roxithromycin-treated patients whereas rashes occurred in two cases in the penicillin group, leading to exclusion from the study. Oral roxithromycin can thus be considered an effective and well-tolerated treatment for erysipelas in adult hospitalized patients.

摘要

相似文献

1
Roxithromycin versus penicillin in the treatment of erysipelas in adults: a comparative study.
Br J Dermatol. 1992 Aug;127(2):155-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1992.tb08048.x.
2
[Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus. A severity factor of erysipelas?].
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1996;123(1):12-5.
3
Antibiotic use in patients with erysipelas: a retrospective study.丹毒患者的抗生素使用:一项回顾性研究。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2001 Oct;3(10):722-4.
4
Intramuscular bipenicillin vs. intravenous penicillin in the treatment of erysipelas in adults: randomized controlled study.成人丹毒治疗中肌内注射双青霉素与静脉注射青霉素的对比:随机对照研究
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2004 Jul;18(4):426-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2004.00938.x.
5
Oral pristinamycin versus standard penicillin regimen to treat erysipelas in adults: randomised, non-inferiority, open trial.口服普那霉素与标准青霉素方案治疗成人丹毒:随机、非劣效、开放试验
BMJ. 2002 Oct 19;325(7369):864. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7369.864.
6
An open comparative study of azithromycin and roxithromycin in the treatment of acute upper respiratory tract infections.阿奇霉素与罗红霉素治疗急性上呼吸道感染的开放性对照研究
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Jun;37 Suppl C:83-92. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_c.83.
7
[Pristinamycin in the treatment of acute bacterial dermohypodermitis in adults. An open study of 42 patients].[普ristinamycin治疗成人急性细菌性皮肤皮下组织炎。42例患者的开放性研究]
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1996;123(1):16-20.
8
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of azithromycin versus roxithromycin in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections.阿奇霉素与罗红霉素治疗急性下呼吸道感染的疗效、安全性及耐受性比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Jun;37 Suppl C:115-24. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_c.115.
9
Erysipelas, a large retrospective study of aetiology and clinical presentation.丹毒:一项关于病因和临床表现的大型回顾性研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 30;15:402. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1134-2.
10
[Therapy and prophylaxis of recurrent erysipelas (author's transl)].复发性丹毒的治疗与预防(作者译)
Med Klin. 1976 Jul 9;71:1197-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of first- and second-line antibiotics for cellulitis and erysipelas: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.一线和二线抗生素治疗蜂窝织炎和丹毒的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Sep 6;316(8):603. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03317-1.
2
The impact of antibiotics on clinical response over time in uncomplicated cellulitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗生素对单纯性蜂窝织炎临床疗效随时间变化的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Infection. 2022 Aug;50(4):859-871. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01842-7. Epub 2022 May 20.
3
Is coverage of S. aureus necessary in cellulitis/erysipelas? A literature review.
金黄色葡萄球菌在蜂窝织炎/丹毒中的覆盖是否有必要?文献综述。
Infection. 2020 Apr;48(2):183-191. doi: 10.1007/s15010-019-01382-7. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing a penicillin or cephalosporin with a macrolide or lincosamide in the treatment of cellulitis or erysipelas.青霉素或头孢菌素与大环内酯类或林可酰胺类抗生素治疗蜂窝织炎或丹毒的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Infection. 2016 Oct;44(5):607-15. doi: 10.1007/s15010-016-0895-x. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
5
Interventions for cellulitis and erysipelas.蜂窝织炎和丹毒的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;2010(6):CD004299. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004299.pub2.
6
Cellulitis and erysipelas.蜂窝织炎和丹毒
BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Jan 2;2008:1708.
7
Oral pristinamycin versus standard penicillin regimen to treat erysipelas in adults: randomised, non-inferiority, open trial.口服普那霉素与标准青霉素方案治疗成人丹毒:随机、非劣效、开放试验
BMJ. 2002 Oct 19;325(7369):864. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7369.864.
8
Roxithromycin. An update of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.罗红霉素。其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗用途的最新进展。
Drugs. 1994 Aug;48(2):297-326. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199448020-00011.