Krepel C J, Gohr C M, Walker A P, Farmer S G, Edmiston C E
Surgical Microbiology Research Laboratory, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Sep;30(9):2330-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.9.2330-2334.1992.
Fifty-four strains of Peptostreptococcus magnus (11 were recovered from abdominal infections, 18 were from nonpuerperal breast abscesses, and 21 were from diabetic foot infections; the type strain and three other strains were from the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Md.) and the type strain of Peptostreptococcus micros were tested for their ability to produce various enzymes, including catalase, hippurate hydrolase, serine dehydratase, threonine dehydratase, collagenase, gelatinase, alkaline phosphatase, and esterase C4. The data were analyzed by cluster analysis. The results showed that all but one strain could be assigned to either of two distinct, valid clusters. The first cluster of 11 strains was composed of strains that were relatively inactive, having produced one or two of the eight strain-dependent enzymes. The second was a large cluster of strains (n = 43) that were considerably more active, all having produced at least three enzymes; the vast majority of strains (89%) produced four or more enzymes. The unclustered strain produced one enzyme that was different from that produced by the strains in the first cluster. The chi 2 test of homogeneity applied to the clustering solution indicated that greater enzyme activity was significantly associated with the site of infection (P less than 0.001). The more enzymatically active P. magnus strains were recovered significantly more often from nonpuerperal breast abscesses and diabetic foot infections than they were from abdominal infections. These results may provide insight into the nature of certain polymicrobial soft tissue infections and suggest that (i) P. magnus may participate more in nonpuerperal breast and diabetic foot infections than in abdominal infections and that (ii) peptostreptococcal production of proteolytic enzymes may have an important adjunctive effect on the pathogenesis of certain soft tissue infections.
对54株大消化链球菌(11株从腹部感染中分离得到,18株从非产褥期乳房脓肿中分离得到,21株从糖尿病足感染中分离得到;模式菌株和其他3株菌株来自美国典型培养物保藏中心,马里兰州罗克维尔)以及微小消化链球菌的模式菌株进行了检测,以确定它们产生各种酶的能力,这些酶包括过氧化氢酶、马尿酸盐水解酶、丝氨酸脱水酶、苏氨酸脱水酶、胶原酶、明胶酶、碱性磷酸酶和酯酶C4。通过聚类分析对数据进行了分析。结果显示,除1株菌株外,所有菌株均可归入两个不同的有效聚类中的一个。第一个聚类包含11株菌株,这些菌株相对不活跃,仅产生了8种菌株依赖性酶中的一两种。第二个聚类是一大群菌株(n = 43),它们的活性要高得多,均产生了至少三种酶;绝大多数菌株(89%)产生了四种或更多种酶。未聚类的菌株产生了一种与第一个聚类中的菌株所产生的酶不同的酶。应用于聚类结果的卡方同质性检验表明,更高的酶活性与感染部位显著相关(P < 0.001)。酶活性更高的大消化链球菌菌株从非产褥期乳房脓肿和糖尿病足感染中分离得到的频率显著高于从腹部感染中分离得到的频率。这些结果可能有助于深入了解某些混合性软组织感染的本质,并表明:(i)大消化链球菌在非产褥期乳房和糖尿病足感染中可能比在腹部感染中参与更多;(ii)消化链球菌产生蛋白水解酶可能对某些软组织感染的发病机制具有重要的辅助作用。