• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伪装特定障碍:报告症状结构化访谈(SIRS)研究

Faking specific disorders: a study of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS).

作者信息

Rogers R, Kropp P R, Bagby R M, Dickens S E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton 76203-3587.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1992 Sep;48(5):643-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199209)48:5<643::aid-jclp2270480511>3.0.co;2-2.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(199209)48:5<643::aid-jclp2270480511>3.0.co;2-2
PMID:1401150
Abstract

An untested assumption of malingering research is that persons who feign mental illness will not attempt to fake a particular disorder, but will be content to fabricate non-specific and possibly global psychiatric impairment. We tested the effectiveness of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) to detect feigning of three diagnostic groupings: schizophrenia, mood disorders, and PTSD on 45 psychologically knowledgeable correctional residents. We found that the SIRS maintained its powers of discrimination with respect to clinical samples. Similar research on faking specific disorders is needed on the MMPI-2 and other psychological measures.

摘要

伪装研究中一个未经检验的假设是,假装精神疾病的人不会试图伪造某一特定障碍,而是满足于编造非特异性的、可能是全身性的精神障碍。我们对45名具有心理学知识的惩教所居民测试了报告症状结构化访谈(SIRS)在检测对三种诊断分组(精神分裂症、心境障碍和创伤后应激障碍)的伪装方面的有效性。我们发现,SIRS相对于临床样本保持了其区分能力。需要在明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版(MMPI - 2)和其他心理测量工具上开展关于伪造特定障碍的类似研究。

相似文献

1
Faking specific disorders: a study of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS).伪装特定障碍:报告症状结构化访谈(SIRS)研究
J Clin Psychol. 1992 Sep;48(5):643-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199209)48:5<643::aid-jclp2270480511>3.0.co;2-2.
2
A brief test for measuring malingering in schizophrenic individuals.
Am J Psychiatry. 1985 Dec;142(12):1478-81. doi: 10.1176/ajp.142.12.1478.
3
Psychometric detection of fabricated symptoms of combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic replication.战斗相关创伤后应激障碍虚构症状的心理测量检测:一项系统性重复研究
J Clin Psychol. 1989 Jan;45(1):76-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198901)45:1<76::aid-jclp2270450111>3.0.co;2-h.
4
Factitious posttraumatic stress disorder.人为性创伤后应激障碍
Am J Psychiatry. 1983 Aug;140(8):1016-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.140.8.1016.
5
Malingering in a correctional setting: the use of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms in a jail sample.惩教机构中的诈病现象:在监狱样本中使用《报告症状结构化访谈》。
Behav Sci Law. 2009 Sep-Oct;27(5):753-65. doi: 10.1002/bsl.892.
6
[Factitious disorders].[做作性障碍]
Nervenarzt. 2017 May;88(5):549-570. doi: 10.1007/s00115-017-0337-8.
7
Efficacy of MMPI-2 validity scales and MCMI-II modifier scales for detecting spurious PTSD claims: F, F-K, Fake Bad Scale, ego strength, subtle-obvious subscales, DIS, and DEB.
J Clin Psychol. 1992 Sep;48(5):681-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199209)48:5<681::aid-jclp2270480516>3.0.co;2-q.
8
Failure to detect fabricated posttraumatic stress disorder with the use of the MMPI in a clinical population.在临床人群中使用明尼苏达多相人格调查表未能检测出伪装的创伤后应激障碍。
Am J Psychiatry. 1990 Aug;147(8):1057-60. doi: 10.1176/ajp.147.8.1057.
9
New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the structured interview of reported symptoms.新的和改进的?对报告症状的结构化访谈原始版本和修订版本的比较。
Assessment. 2013 Apr;20(2):210-8. doi: 10.1177/1073191112464389. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
10
Mad or bad-thoughts on the equivocal relationship between mental disorder and criminality.疯狂还是邪恶——关于精神障碍与犯罪之间模糊关系的思考
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1980;3(4):421-33. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(80)90026-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of symptom exaggeration among North American independent medical evaluation examinees: A systematic review of observational studies.北美独立医学评估受检者中症状夸大的患病率:观察性研究的系统评价
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0324684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324684. eCollection 2025.
2
Civil Forensic Evaluation in Psychological Injury and Law: Legal, Professional, and Ethical Considerations.心理创伤与法律中的民事法医评估:法律、专业及伦理考量
Psychol Inj Law. 2020;13(4):327-353. doi: 10.1007/s12207-020-09398-3. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
3
Differentiating Factitious from Malingered Symptomatology: the Development of a Psychometric Approach.
区分做作性与诈病症状学:一种心理测量方法的发展
Psychol Inj Law. 2017;10(4):341-357. doi: 10.1007/s12207-017-9301-y. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
4
The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST).米勒症状法医评估测试(M-FAST)土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2015 Sep;52(3):296-302. doi: 10.5152/npa.2015.7587. Epub 2015 Jul 7.