• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The picture superiority effect in categorization: visual or semantic?

作者信息

Job R, Rumiati R, Lotto L

机构信息

Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, Universita' di Padova, Italy.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Sep;18(5):1019-28. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.5.1019.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.18.5.1019
PMID:1402707
Abstract

Two experiments are reported whose aim was to replicate and generalize the results presented by Snodgrass and McCullough (1986) on the effect of visual similarity in the categorization process. For pictures, Snodgrass and McCullough's results were replicated because Ss took longer to discriminate elements from 2 categories when they were visually similar than when they were visually dissimilar. However, unlike Snodgrass and McCullough, an analogous increase was also observed for word stimuli. The pattern of results obtained here can be explained most parsimoniously with reference to the effect of semantic similarity, or semantic and visual relatedness, rather than to visual similarity alone.

摘要

相似文献

1
The picture superiority effect in categorization: visual or semantic?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Sep;18(5):1019-28. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.5.1019.
2
An enquiry into the process of categorization of pictures and words.对图片和文字分类过程的探究。
Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Feb;96(1):267-87. doi: 10.2466/pms.2003.96.1.267.
3
Visual effects in picture and word categorization.图片和文字分类中的视觉效果。
Mem Cognit. 1999 Jul;27(4):674-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03211561.
4
Categorizing chairs and naming pears: category differences in object processing as a function of task and priming.对椅子进行分类和给梨命名:作为任务和启动效应函数的物体加工中的类别差异。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Sep;25(5):606-24. doi: 10.3758/bf03211303.
5
[The effect of visual similarity on picture categorization and identification].
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1995 Feb;65(6):437-45. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.65.437.
6
The direction of hemispheric asymmetries for object categorization at different levels of abstraction depends on the task.在不同抽象层次上进行物体分类时,半球不对称性的方向取决于任务。
Brain Cogn. 2008 Jul;67(2):197-211. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.003. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
7
Stimulus-driven or autonomous shift or attention?刺激驱动还是自主转移或注意力?
Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Jun;80(3 Pt 2):1187-99. doi: 10.2466/pms.1995.80.3c.1187.
8
The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.符号比较中语义一致性的位置与本质:来自斯特鲁普效应的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2002 Jan;30(1):3-17. doi: 10.3758/bf03195260.
9
Crowded and sparse domains in object recognition: consequences for categorization and naming.目标识别中的密集和稀疏区域:对分类和命名的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2006 Mar;60(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Dec 22.
10
The picture superiority effect in associative recognition.联想识别中的图片优势效应。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Oct;36(7):1351-9. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.7.1351.

引用本文的文献

1
The label-feedback effect is influenced by target category in visual search.标签反馈效应在视觉搜索中受目标类别影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0306736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306736. eCollection 2024.
2
Do graspable objects always leave a motor signature? A study on memory traces.可抓握物体是否总会留下运动痕迹?一项关于记忆痕迹的研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2022 Dec;240(12):3193-3206. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06487-4. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
3
Knowledge of semantic categories in normal aged: Influence of education.正常老年人语义类别的知识:教育的影响。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2007 Apr-Jun;1(2):166-172. doi: 10.1590/s1980-57642008dn10200009.
4
Speed of processing explains the picture-word asymmetry in conditional naming.加工速度解释了条件命名中图片-词汇不对称现象。
Psychol Res. 2010 Jan;74(1):71-81. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0182-2. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
5
Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars.对非典型范例进行分类过程中的分级运动反应。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jan;35(1):15-28. doi: 10.3758/bf03195938.
6
Naming pictures at no cost: asymmetries in picture and word conditional naming.免费为图片命名:图片和单词条件命名中的不对称性
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):790-4. doi: 10.3758/bf03196336.
7
Effects of plane rotation, task, and complexity on recognition of familiar and chimeric objects.
Mem Cognit. 2002 Jun;30(4):499-510. doi: 10.3758/bf03194951.
8
Visual effects in picture and word categorization.图片和文字分类中的视觉效果。
Mem Cognit. 1999 Jul;27(4):674-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03211561.
9
Categorizing chairs and naming pears: category differences in object processing as a function of task and priming.对椅子进行分类和给梨命名:作为任务和启动效应函数的物体加工中的类别差异。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Sep;25(5):606-24. doi: 10.3758/bf03211303.
10
Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: evidence from naming and object decision.知觉分化作为物体加工中类别效应的一个来源:来自命名和物体判断的证据。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Jan;25(1):18-35. doi: 10.3758/bf03197282.