Harry B
Department of Psychiatry, University of Missouri, Columbia Health Sciences Center.
J Forensic Sci. 1992 Sep;37(5):1327-33.
The author reviewed the literature concerning criminals' explanations of their crimes and then studied the explanations given by 100 incarcerated men. He found no significant associations between juvenile or adult arrest histories, alias use, age at time of the crime, trial plea, sentence length, duration of incarceration, and explanation types used. Only murderers significantly used a specific explanation type. These observations suggest that explanations are largely independent of traditional criminological attributes; that prolonged confinement to prison does not result in offenders admitting to their crimes; and, that killers have an especially difficult time accepting responsibility for taking the life of another human being.
作者回顾了有关罪犯对其罪行解释的文献,然后研究了100名被监禁男性给出的解释。他发现青少年或成人的被捕记录、使用别名、犯罪时的年龄、审判时的认罪、刑期长短、监禁时长与所使用的解释类型之间没有显著关联。只有杀人犯显著地使用了一种特定的解释类型。这些观察结果表明,解释在很大程度上独立于传统的犯罪学属性;长期监禁并不会导致罪犯承认自己的罪行;而且,杀人犯在接受对他人生命的剥夺所应承担的责任方面尤其困难。