Suppr超能文献

安排患者进行冠状动脉手术排队:年龄和工作状态会改变加拿大专家的决策吗?

Placing patients in the queue for coronary surgery: do age and work status alter Canadian specialists' decisions?

作者信息

Naylor C D, Levinton C M, Baigrie R S, Goldman B S

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Sep-Oct;7(5):492-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02599450.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of age and work status on whether and where cardiovascular specialists would place hypothetical patients in the queue for coronary surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mailed survey presenting a set of clinical scenarios either to be rated on a scale with 7 time frames for urgency of need or to be designated as questionable/inappropriate for intervention. The basic scenario was a patient with mild-moderate stable angina, good left ventricular function, and limited coronary disease; operative risks and stress test results were varied. Three identifiers were used: "45-year-old civil servant gainfully employed"; "45-year-old laborer disabled by angina, faces job loss"; and "75-year-old retiree, angina limits golf."

PARTICIPANTS

Cardiologists and cardiac surgeons practicing in five Ontario medical centers (n = 120).

RESULTS

There was a 59% response rate (120 usable responses). Large shifts in willingness to intervene occurred in favor of the disabled laborer (p less than 0.0001) and against the retiree (p-value ranges from 0.04 to less than 0.0001, depending on operative risk and stress test results), but not for the employed civil servant. Striking effects (p less than 0.0001) were also evident in ratings of waiting time, with the order of priority being the disabled laborer first, the civil servant second, and the retiree last. The overall mean shift due to work status or age was equal to, or larger than, the mean shift due to clinical factors, such as stress test results, changes in severity of stable angina, and extent of coronary disease.

CONCLUSION

Cardiovascular specialists may place considerable weight on age and work status in determining urgency and appropriateness of coronary revascularization. Risk-benefit concerns may partly explain shifting thresholds for intervention, but not differential waiting times. The influence of these factors should be sought in utilization audits and addressed from an ethical perspective.

摘要

目的

确定年龄和工作状态对心血管专科医生将假设患者列入冠状动脉手术等候队列的决策及列入位置的影响。

材料与方法

通过邮寄调查问卷呈现一系列临床场景,要求参与者根据7个时间框架对需求紧迫性进行评分,或指定为有问题/不适合干预。基本场景为一名患有轻中度稳定型心绞痛、左心室功能良好且冠状动脉疾病有限的患者;手术风险和压力测试结果各不相同。使用了三个身份标识:“45岁有工作的公务员”;“因心绞痛致残面临失业的45岁劳动者”;“因心绞痛限制打高尔夫球的75岁退休人员”。

参与者

安大略省五个医疗中心的心脏病专家和心脏外科医生(n = 120)。

结果

回复率为59%(120份有效回复)。干预意愿出现了大幅变化,倾向于残疾劳动者(p < 0.0001),反对退休人员(p值范围为0.04至< 0.0001,取决于手术风险和压力测试结果),但对在职公务员没有影响。在等待时间评分方面也有显著影响(p < 0.0001),优先顺序为残疾劳动者第一,公务员第二,退休人员最后。由于工作状态或年龄导致的总体平均变化等于或大于因临床因素(如压力测试结果、稳定型心绞痛严重程度变化和冠状动脉疾病范围)导致的平均变化。

结论

心血管专科医生在确定冠状动脉血运重建的紧迫性和适宜性时,可能会高度重视年龄和工作状态。风险效益考量可能部分解释了干预阈值的变化,但无法解释不同的等待时间。应在利用审计中探寻这些因素的影响,并从伦理角度加以解决。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验