• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉造影和搭桥手术审计。

Audit of coronary angiography and bypass surgery.

作者信息

Gray D, Hampton J R, Bernstein S J, Kosecoff J, Brook R H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 1990 Jun 2;335(8701):1317-20. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91196-h.

DOI:10.1016/0140-6736(90)91196-h
PMID:1971385
Abstract

The appropriateness of coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass surgery in the Trent regional health authority was assessed by comparison with predetermined consensus criteria. 49% of coronary angiographies were considered to be entirely appropriate in relation to the patient's clinical condition, but 21% were deemed inappropriate. Coronary artery bypass surgery was considered appropriate in 55% of patients, but inappropriate in 16%. Audit by "appropriateness" scores may help to determine which patients should first be investigated and treated when resources are limited and waiting lists are long.

摘要

通过与预先确定的共识标准进行比较,对特伦特地区卫生当局进行冠状动脉造影和冠状动脉搭桥手术的适宜性进行了评估。49%的冠状动脉造影被认为与患者的临床状况完全适宜,但21%被认为不适宜。55%的患者冠状动脉搭桥手术被认为是适宜的,但16%是不适宜的。通过“适宜性”评分进行审计,可能有助于确定在资源有限且等候名单很长时,哪些患者应首先接受检查和治疗。

相似文献

1
Audit of coronary angiography and bypass surgery.冠状动脉造影和搭桥手术审计。
Lancet. 1990 Jun 2;335(8701):1317-20. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91196-h.
2
The appropriateness of the use of cardiovascular procedures. British versus U.S. perspectives.心血管手术使用的适宜性。英国与美国的观点。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1993 Winter;9(1):3-10. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300002981.
3
Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization.在被认为适合进行血运重建的患者中,冠状动脉血运重建手术的使用不足。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 1;344(9):645-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103013440906.
4
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Newfoundland and Labrador.纽芬兰与拉布拉多省的冠状动脉搭桥手术。
CMAJ. 1998 May 5;158(9):1137-42.
5
Hypothetical ratings of coronary angiography appropriateness: are they associated with actual angiographic findings, mortality, and revascularisation rate? The ACRE study.冠状动脉造影适宜性的假设性评级:它们与实际血管造影结果、死亡率和血运重建率相关吗?ACRE研究。
Heart. 2001 Jun;85(6):672-9. doi: 10.1136/heart.85.6.672.
6
Variations in the use of coronary arteriography in the UK: the RITA trial coronary arteriogram register.英国冠状动脉造影术使用情况的差异:RITA试验冠状动脉造影登记
QJM. 1995 Mar;88(3):167-73.
7
Diagnosis and treatment of coronary disease: comparison of doctors' attitudes in the USA and the UK.冠心病的诊断与治疗:美国和英国医生态度的比较
Lancet. 1988 Apr 2;1(8588):750-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91550-4.
8
Comparison of the appropriateness of coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass graft surgery between Canada and New York State.加拿大与纽约州冠状动脉造影和冠状动脉旁路移植手术适宜性的比较。
JAMA. 1994 Sep 28;272(12):934-40.
9
[Appropriateness of use in invasive cardiology].[在侵入性心脏病学中的使用适宜性]
Herz. 2001 Sep;26(6):425-8.
10
Invasive and medical therapy for coronary artery disease.冠状动脉疾病的侵入性治疗与药物治疗
Lancet. 2002 Jan 26;359(9303):355. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07515-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the Knowledge Base of Health Services Research to Redefine Health Care Systems.利用卫生服务研究知识库重新定义医疗保健系统。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Oct;30(10):1547-56. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3298-2. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
2
Containing U.S. health care costs: What bullet to bite?控制美国医疗保健成本:该咬哪颗子弹?
Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Mar;1991(Suppl):1-12.
3
An evaluation of the appropriateness of advice and healthcare contacts made following calls to NHS Direct Wales.评估通过拨打威尔士国民健康服务热线(NHS Direct Wales)后提供的建议和医疗保健联系的适宜性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Sep 30;9:178. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-178.
4
How good is the quality of health care in the United States? 1998.1998年美国医疗保健的质量如何?
Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):843-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00403.x.
5
Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.在初级保健中制定和应用质量指标所使用的研究方法。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):358-64. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.358.
6
Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes.基层医疗中三种常见病症的质量评估:专家小组制定的心绞痛、哮喘和2型糖尿病审查标准的有效性和可靠性。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Jun;11(2):125-30. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.125.
7
Angioplasty, bypass surgery or medical treatment: how should we decide?血管成形术、搭桥手术还是药物治疗:我们该如何抉择?
Heart. 2002 Nov;88(5):451-2. doi: 10.1136/heart.88.5.451.
8
Hypothetical ratings of coronary angiography appropriateness: are they associated with actual angiographic findings, mortality, and revascularisation rate? The ACRE study.冠状动脉造影适宜性的假设性评级:它们与实际血管造影结果、死亡率和血运重建率相关吗?ACRE研究。
Heart. 2001 Jun;85(6):672-9. doi: 10.1136/heart.85.6.672.
9
Inequalities in access to coronary angiography and revascularisation: the association of deprivation and location of primary care services.冠状动脉造影和血运重建治疗可及性的不平等:贫困与基层医疗服务地点的关联
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Jun;50(455):449-54.
10
Public disclosure of performance data: learning from the US experience.绩效数据的公开披露:借鉴美国经验
Qual Health Care. 2000 Mar;9(1):53-7. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.1.53.