• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青春期早期的友谊相似性:性别和种族模式。

Friendship similarity during early adolescence: gender and racial patterns.

作者信息

Clark M L, Ayers M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University.

出版信息

J Psychol. 1992 Jul;126(4):393-405. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1992.10543372.

DOI:10.1080/00223980.1992.10543372
PMID:1403972
Abstract

We studied the relationship of reciprocity, gender, and racial composition (Caucasian, African American, cross-race) of adolescent friendship dyads to similarity and proximity in 136 young adolescents. We found that adolescents selected friends who were of the same gender and race and that female dyads were more similar than male dyads on verbal achievement and several personality dimensions. Caucasian dyads were more similar than African American dyads on verbal achievement, mental alertness, and dominance. African American adolescents had more contact with their best friends outside school, whereas Caucasian adolescent friends had more in-school contact. African American students had fewer reciprocal relationships than the Caucasian students. Cross-race friendships were less reciprocal than same-race friendships. Race and gender were important in determining friendship patterns. Similarity and proximity were more important than reciprocity in understanding early adolescent friendships.

摘要

我们研究了136名青少年友谊二元组中的互惠性、性别和种族构成(白人、非裔美国人、跨种族)与相似性和亲近程度之间的关系。我们发现,青少年会选择与自己性别和种族相同的朋友,并且在语言成绩和几个性格维度上,女性二元组比男性二元组更相似。在语言成绩、思维敏捷度和支配性方面,白人二元组比非裔美国人二元组更相似。非裔美国青少年与他们最好的朋友在学校外有更多接触,而白人青少年朋友在学校内有更多接触。非裔美国学生的互惠关系比白人学生少。跨种族友谊的互惠性比同种族友谊少。种族和性别在决定友谊模式方面很重要。在理解青少年早期友谊方面,相似性和亲近程度比互惠性更重要。

相似文献

1
Friendship similarity during early adolescence: gender and racial patterns.青春期早期的友谊相似性:性别和种族模式。
J Psychol. 1992 Jul;126(4):393-405. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1992.10543372.
2
School and neighborhood friendship patterns of blacks and whites in early adolescence.青少年早期黑人和白人的学校及邻里友谊模式。
Child Dev. 1990 Apr;61(2):524-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02797.x.
3
Patterns of adult cross-racial friendships: A context for understanding contemporary race relations.成人跨种族友谊模式:理解当代种族关系的一个背景
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2016 Oct;22(4):479-494. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000079. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
4
Behavioral, affective, and social correlates of involvement in cross-sex friendship in elementary school.小学阶段参与异性友谊的行为、情感及社会关联因素。
Child Dev. 1996 Oct;67(5):2269-86.
5
Does gender-bending help or hinder friending? The roles of gender and gender similarity in friendship dissolution.性别倒错有助于还是阻碍交友?性别和性别相似性在友谊破裂中的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Jun;56(6):1157-1169. doi: 10.1037/dev0000930. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
6
Similarity in depressive symptoms in adolescents' friendship dyads: selection or socialization?青少年友谊对抑郁症状的相似性:是选择还是社会化?
Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;47(6):1804-14. doi: 10.1037/a0023872. Epub 2011 May 30.
7
Gender, academic achievement, and preferences for cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning among African-American adolescents.非裔美国青少年的性别、学业成绩以及对合作、竞争和个人主义学习方式的偏好。
J Psychol. 1992 Jul;126(4):385-92. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1992.10543371.
8
Opportunities and constraints: black-white differences in the formation of interracial friendships.机遇与限制:跨种族友谊形成中的黑白差异
Child Dev. 1987 Oct;58(5):1358-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1987.tb01464.x.
9
Interracial and intraracial contact, school-level diversity, and change in racial identity status among African American adolescents.非裔美国青少年的跨种族和种族内接触、学校层面的多样性以及种族认同状态的变化。
Child Dev. 2010 Sep-Oct;81(5):1431-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01483.x.
10
Sex differences in self-concept among African adolescents.非洲青少年自我概念中的性别差异。
Percept Mot Skills. 1991 Aug;73(1):191-4. doi: 10.2466/pms.1991.73.1.191.

引用本文的文献

1
Why is Korean girls' suicidal ideation rate higher than boys' rate? The role of gender heterogeneity in peer groups.为什么韩国女孩的自杀意念率高于男孩?同伴群体中性别异质性的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 6;18(9):e0290072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290072. eCollection 2023.
2
Social relationship provisions and loneliness in school: Child- and classroom-level effects.社会关系规定与学校孤独感:儿童和课堂层面的影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2023 Aug;99:101218. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
3
A multi-method exploration into the social networks of young teenagers and their physical activity behavior.
多方法探究青少年的社交网络及其身体活动行为。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10081-0.
4
Extracurricular Activities in Multiethnic Middle Schools: Ideal Context for Positive Intergroup Attitudes?多民族中学的课外活动:积极的群体间态度的理想环境?
J Res Adolesc. 2017 Jun;27(2):407-422. doi: 10.1111/jora.12278. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
5
Race, disability, and grade: Social relationships in children with autism spectrum disorders.种族、残疾与年级:自闭症谱系障碍儿童的社会关系
Autism. 2017 Jan;21(1):92-99. doi: 10.1177/1362361315627792. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
6
Friendship group position and substance use.友谊群体地位与物质使用。
Addict Behav. 2014 May;39(5):923-33. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.12.009. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
7
Community landscapes: an integrative approach to determine overlapping network module hierarchy, identify key nodes and predict network dynamics.社区景观:一种综合方法,用于确定重叠网络模块层次结构、识别关键节点和预测网络动态。
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 2;5(9):e12528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012528.
8
FRIENDSHIP CHOICES OF MULTIRACIAL ADOLESCENTS: RACIAL HOMOPHILY, BLENDING, OR AMALGAMATION?*.多族裔青少年的友谊选择:种族同质性、融合还是合并?*
Soc Sci Res. 2007 Jun 1;36(2):633-653. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.12.001.
9
Attachment, Friendship, and Psychosocial Functioning in Early Adolescence.青少年早期的依恋、友谊与心理社会功能
J Early Adolesc. 2004 Nov 1;24(4):326-356. doi: 10.1177/0272431604268530.
10
Cultural identity, acculturation, and mental health among adolescents in east London's multiethnic community.伦敦东部多民族社区青少年的文化认同、文化适应与心理健康
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Apr;59(4):296-302. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.014456.