Flanders R A
Office of Community Health, Illinois Department of Public Health, Springfield 62761.
J Public Health Dent. 1992 Fall;52(5):303-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1992.tb02293.x.
Dental amalgam has been the subject of intermittent controversy since it was introduced into dental practice approximately 150 years ago. The controversy has centered on the use of mercury in dental amalgam and the potential health implications to dental patients and dental health professionals from mercury exposure. In recent years the debate over the use of dental amalgam has intensified due to several articles in professional journals and media coverage by television and the press. This paper reviews the recent literature regarding dental amalgam, describes the activities of the antiamalgamists, examines the alternatives to dental amalgam, and reviews the recommendations for additional research. The existing scientific evidence does not demonstrate that mercury in dental amalgam poses a public health hazard. However, researchers on both sides of the controversy agree that much remains to be examined about the health implications of dental amalgam and that the subject merits continued research.
自大约150年前牙科汞合金被引入牙科临床实践以来,它一直是间歇性争议的主题。争议主要集中在牙科汞合金中汞的使用以及牙科患者和牙科保健专业人员因接触汞而可能产生的健康影响。近年来,由于专业期刊上的几篇文章以及电视和媒体的报道,关于牙科汞合金使用的争论愈演愈烈。本文回顾了有关牙科汞合金的最新文献,描述了反对汞合金者的活动,研究了牙科汞合金的替代品,并回顾了进一步研究的建议。现有的科学证据并未表明牙科汞合金中的汞会对公众健康造成危害。然而,争议双方的研究人员都认为,关于牙科汞合金对健康的影响仍有许多有待研究的地方,这个主题值得继续研究。