• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health Scares: Tracing Their Nature, Growth and Spread.健康恐慌:追溯其本质、发展与传播。
Clin Psychol Eur. 2023 Dec 22;5(4):e12209. doi: 10.32872/cpe.12209. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
[HEALTH SCARES: A CHRONICLE UNNECESSARY ANXIETY].[健康恐慌:一部关于不必要焦虑的编年史]
Harefuah. 2016 Dec;155(12):774-777.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents?放射性物质释放的应急响应:我们是否已与应急响应人员群体进行了有效沟通,使其做好安全应对这些事件的准备?
Health Phys. 2018 Feb;114(2):208-213. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000757.
5
Media Data and Vaccine Hesitancy: Scoping Review.媒体数据与疫苗犹豫:范围综述
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Aug 10;2(2):e37300. doi: 10.2196/37300. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
6
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
7
Health scares: Professional priorities.健康恐慌:专业优先级。
Health (London). 2010 Jan;14(1):3-21. doi: 10.1177/1363459309341875.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
[Electromagnetic fields: damage to health due to the nocebo effect].[电磁场:由反安慰剂效应导致的健康损害]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Apr 28;151(17):953-6.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of psychosocial aspects in adults in post-COVID-19 condition: the EURONET-SOMA recommendations on core outcome domains for clinical and research use.新冠后成年人群心理社会因素评估:EURONET-SOMA关于临床与研究使用的核心结局领域建议
BMC Med. 2025 Feb 11;23(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03927-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Did a Nocebo Effect Contribute to the Rise in Special Education Enrollment Following the Flint, Michigan Water Crisis?在密歇根州弗林特市水危机之后,反安慰剂效应是否导致了特殊教育入学人数的增加?
Clin Psychol Eur. 2023 Mar 31;5(1):e9577. doi: 10.32872/cpe.9577. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Everything causes cancer? Beliefs and attitudes towards cancer prevention among anti-vaxxers, flat earthers, and reptilian conspiracists: online cross sectional survey.一切都会致癌吗?反疫苗接种者、地平说者和爬虫族阴谋论者对癌症预防的信仰和态度:在线横断面调查。
BMJ. 2022 Dec 21;379:e072561. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072561.
3
Impact of media coverage on side effect reports from the COVID-19 vaccine.媒体报道对 COVID-19 疫苗副作用报告的影响。
J Psychosom Res. 2023 Jan;164:111093. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111093. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
4
The Effect of Television and Print News Stories on the Nocebo Responding Following a Generic Medication Switch.电视和平面新闻报道对通用药物转换后无安慰剂反应的影响。
Clin Psychol Eur. 2020 Jun 30;2(2):e2623. doi: 10.32872/cpe.v2i2.2623. eCollection 2020 Jun.
5
Increasing and dampening the nocebo response following medicine-taking: A randomised controlled trial.服药后增强和抑制不良反应:一项随机对照试验。
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Nov;150:110630. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110630. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
6
Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? A test of four psychosocial hypotheses.谁容易受到网络健康谣言的影响?对四个心理社会假设的检验。
Health Psychol. 2021 Apr;40(4):274-284. doi: 10.1037/hea0000978. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
7
Public responses to the Salisbury Novichok incident: a cross-sectional survey of anxiety, anger, uncertainty, perceived risk and avoidance behaviour in the local community.公众对索尔兹伯里诺维乔克事件的反应:对当地社区焦虑、愤怒、不确定性、感知风险及回避行为的横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 25;10(9):e036071. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036071.
8
Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S.阴谋论是美国控制 COVID-19 传播的障碍
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;263:113356. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
9
Prospective study of nocebo effects related to symptoms of idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF).与归因于电磁场的特发性环境敏感性(IEI-EMF)相关的症状的拟安慰剂效应的前瞻性研究。
Environ Res. 2020 Nov;190:110019. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110019. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
10
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.

健康恐慌:追溯其本质、发展与传播。

Health Scares: Tracing Their Nature, Growth and Spread.

作者信息

MacKrill Kate, Witthöft Michael, Wessely Simon, Petrie Keith J

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Experimental Psychopathology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Eur. 2023 Dec 22;5(4):e12209. doi: 10.32872/cpe.12209. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.32872/cpe.12209
PMID:38357430
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10863677/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health scares are highly publicised threats to health that increase public concern and protective behaviours but are later shown to be unfounded. Although health scares have become more common in recent times, they have received very little research attention. This is despite the fact that health scares often have negative outcomes for individuals and community by affecting health behaviours and causing high levels of often unnecessary anxiety.

METHOD

In this paper we undertook a review and analysis of the major types of health scares as well as the background factors associated with health scares and their spread.

RESULTS

We found most health scares fell into seven main categories; environmental contaminants, food, malicious incidents, medical treatments, public health interventions, radiation from technology and exotic diseases. For most health scares there are important background factors and incident characteristics that affect how they develop. Background factors include conspiracy theories, trust in governmental agencies, anxiety, modern health worries and wariness of chemicals. Incident characteristic include being newly developed, not understood or unseen, man-made rather than natural and whether the incident is out of personal control. We also identified the aspects of traditional and social media that exacerbate the rapid spread of health scares.

CONCLUSION

More research is needed to identify the characteristics of media stories that intensify the levels of public concern. Guidelines around the media's reporting of health incidents and potential health threats may be necessary in order to reduce levels of public anxiety and the negative public health impact of health scares.

摘要

背景

健康恐慌是被高度宣传的对健康的威胁,会增加公众的担忧和保护行为,但后来被证明是毫无根据的。尽管近年来健康恐慌变得更加普遍,但它们很少受到研究关注。尽管事实上健康恐慌往往会通过影响健康行为并导致高度的、通常是不必要的焦虑,对个人和社区产生负面后果。

方法

在本文中,我们对健康恐慌的主要类型以及与健康恐慌及其传播相关的背景因素进行了综述和分析。

结果

我们发现大多数健康恐慌可分为七大类;环境污染物、食品、恶意事件、医疗治疗、公共卫生干预、技术辐射和外来疾病。对于大多数健康恐慌而言,存在影响其发展方式的重要背景因素和事件特征。背景因素包括阴谋论、对政府机构的信任、焦虑、现代健康担忧以及对化学物质的警惕。事件特征包括新出现、不被理解或未曾见过、人为而非自然以及事件是否超出个人控制范围。我们还确定了传统媒体和社交媒体中加剧健康恐慌迅速传播的方面。

结论

需要更多研究来确定加剧公众担忧程度的媒体报道的特征。为了降低公众焦虑水平以及健康恐慌对公众健康的负面影响,围绕媒体对健康事件和潜在健康威胁的报道制定指导方针可能是必要的。