• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度损伤对一级创伤中心的影响。

Impact of minimal injuries on a level I trauma center.

作者信息

Hoff W S, Tinkoff G H, Lucke J F, Lehr S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Lehigh Valley Hospital Center, Allentown, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1992 Sep;33(3):408-12. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199209000-00012.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199209000-00012
PMID:1404510
Abstract

Overtriage (i.e.; transport of patients with minimal injuries to a trauma center) has been accepted as necessary to avoid missing clinically significant injuries. We reviewed our experience with 344 patients (ISS less than or equal to 4) who were admitted to a level I trauma center during a 2-year period. The trauma team was activated for 209 patients (TA), and emergency department referrals accounted for 135 (ED). One hundred seventy-three patients (TA = 64%, ED = 36%) met American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma (ACSCOT) field triage criteria (FTC). Mechanism of injury, especially ejection from a motor vehicle, was the most frequently utilized FTC indicator. We found no differences between the TA and ED groups relative to Trauma Score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Injury Severity Score, length of stay, or ICU days. Mean total costs were higher for the TA group than for the ED group. The TA group had a higher nursing acuity level than the ED group. Compliance with FTC yields an inherent overtriage of minimally injured patients; however, noncompliance with FTC compounds the overtriage rate. Failure to comply with FTC is costly, labor intensive, and may represent misuse of the trauma system. We propose continual re-education of prehospital personnel, increased responsibility of all hospitals in the trauma center catchment area, and protocols for "downstaging" trauma resuscitation in minimally injured patients.

摘要

过度分诊(即:将轻伤患者转运至创伤中心)已被认为是避免漏诊具有临床意义损伤的必要措施。我们回顾了在两年期间被收治于一级创伤中心的344例患者(损伤严重度评分小于或等于4)的情况。创伤团队为209例患者启动(TA组),急诊科转诊患者为135例(ED组)。173例患者(TA组占64%,ED组占36%)符合美国外科医师学会创伤委员会(ACSCOT)现场分诊标准(FTC)。损伤机制,尤其是从机动车中被抛出,是最常被使用的FTC指标。我们发现TA组和ED组在创伤评分、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、损伤严重度评分、住院时间或重症监护病房天数方面没有差异。TA组的平均总费用高于ED组。TA组的护理敏锐度水平高于ED组。遵守FTC会导致对轻伤患者的固有过度分诊;然而,不遵守FTC会使过度分诊率更高。不遵守FTC成本高昂、劳动强度大,可能意味着对创伤系统的滥用。我们建议对院前人员进行持续再教育,增加创伤中心服务区域内所有医院的责任,并制定针对轻伤患者“降级”创伤复苏的方案。

相似文献

1
Impact of minimal injuries on a level I trauma center.轻度损伤对一级创伤中心的影响。
J Trauma. 1992 Sep;33(3):408-12. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199209000-00012.
2
Validation of new trauma triage rules for trauma attending response to the emergency department.急诊科创伤主治医生应对新创伤分诊规则的验证
J Trauma. 2002 Jun;52(6):1153-8; discussion 1158-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200206000-00022.
3
Attempting to validate the overtriage/undertriage matrix at a Level I trauma center.试图在一级创伤中心验证过度分诊/分诊不足矩阵。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Dec;83(6):1173-1178. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001623.
4
Secondary overtriage: the burden of unnecessary interfacility transfers in a rural trauma system.再次过度分诊:农村创伤体系中不必要的机构间转运负担。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Aug;148(8):763-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2132.
5
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.
6
Asking a Better Question: Development and Evaluation of the Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) Metric as a Novel Indicator of Major Trauma.提出更好的问题:创伤干预需求(NFTI)指标作为重大创伤新指标的开发与评估
J Trauma Nurs. 2017 May/Jun;24(3):150-157. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000283.
7
Should we still use motor vehicle intrusion as a sole triage criterion for the use of trauma center resources?我们是否仍应将机动车碰撞伤作为使用创伤中心资源的唯一分诊标准?
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):235-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.033. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
8
Secondary overtriage: a consequence of an immature trauma system.二次过度分诊:不成熟创伤系统的一个后果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Jan;206(1):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.285. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
9
Mechanism of injury is not a predictor of trauma center admission.损伤机制并非创伤中心收治的预测指标。
Am Surg. 2013 Nov;79(11):1149-53.
10
An Evaluation of Pediatric Secondary Overtriage in the Pennsylvania Trauma System.宾夕法尼亚创伤系统中儿科二次过度分诊评估。
J Surg Res. 2021 Aug;264:368-374. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.032. Epub 2021 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiological findings and radiation exposure during trauma workup in a cohort of 1124 level 1 trauma patients.1124名一级创伤患者在创伤检查期间的放射学检查结果及辐射暴露情况。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Feb;402(1):159-165. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1515-z. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
2
[Injury severity and pattern at the scene. What is the influence of the mechanism of injury?].[现场损伤的严重程度和类型。损伤机制有何影响?]
Unfallchirurg. 2010 May;113(5):360-5. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1776-x.
3
The role of emergency medicine physicians in trauma care in North America: evolution of a specialty.
北美创伤急救医学中急诊医师的角色:专业的演变。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009 Aug 23;17:37. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-37.
4
Precision of field triage in patients brought to a trauma centre after introducing trauma team activation guidelines.引入创伤团队激活指南后,对送往创伤中心的患者进行现场分诊的精确性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009 Jan 9;17:1. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-1.
5
The trauma team--a system of initial trauma care.创伤团队——初始创伤护理系统。
Postgrad Med J. 1996 Oct;72(852):587-93. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.72.852.587.