• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提出更好的问题:创伤干预需求(NFTI)指标作为重大创伤新指标的开发与评估

Asking a Better Question: Development and Evaluation of the Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) Metric as a Novel Indicator of Major Trauma.

作者信息

Roden-Foreman Jacob W, Rapier Nakia R, Yelverton Luanna, Foreman Michael L

机构信息

Division of Trauma, Critical Care, and Acute Care Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

J Trauma Nurs. 2017 May/Jun;24(3):150-157. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000283.

DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000283
PMID:28486318
Abstract

Many existing metrics, such as Injury Severity Score (ISS), cannot fully describe many trauma patients because of comorbidities. This study developed and evaluated the Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) metric as a novel indicator of major trauma. The NFTI metric was developed from an analysis of 2,396 trauma patients at a Level I trauma center. Six commonly recorded registry variables were found to be indicative of major trauma and comprised the NFTI criteria: receiving packed red blood cells within 4 hr; discharge from the emergency department (ED) to the operating room within 90 min; discharge from the ED to interventional radiology; discharge from the ED to the intensive care unit (ICU) with an ICU length of stay (LOS) of 3 or more days; mechanical ventilation outside of procedural anesthesia within 3 days; or death within 60 hr. Patients meeting any NFTI criteria are classified as having major traumas and, therefore, needing trauma activations (NFTI+). Need For Trauma Intervention was tested in an overlapping sample of 9,737 patients. Being NFTI+ was associated with higher trauma activation levels, older age, higher ISS, worse ED vitals, longer hospital LOS, and mortality. Only 13 of 561 deaths were not NFTI+ and all were in patients with do not resuscitate (DNR) orders; using ISS greater than 15 missed 73 mortalities, 46 with DNR orders. Results suggest that NFTI provides a comprehensive view of both anatomy and physiology in a manner that self-adjusts for age, frailty, and comorbidities as long as care teams adjust their treatments. Need For Trauma Intervention appears to be a unique, simple, and effective tool to retrospectively identify major trauma, regardless of ISS.

摘要

许多现有指标,如损伤严重度评分(ISS),由于存在合并症,无法全面描述许多创伤患者的情况。本研究开发并评估了创伤干预需求(NFTI)指标,将其作为重大创伤的一种新型指标。NFTI指标是通过对一家一级创伤中心的2396例创伤患者进行分析得出的。研究发现六个常见的登记变量可指示重大创伤,并构成了NFTI标准:在4小时内接受浓缩红细胞输注;在90分钟内从急诊科(ED)转入手术室;从ED转入介入放射科;从ED转入重症监护病房(ICU)且ICU住院时长(LOS)为3天或更长时间;在3天内进行非手术麻醉下的机械通气;或在60小时内死亡。符合任何NFTI标准的患者被归类为患有重大创伤,因此需要启动创伤急救(NFTI+)。在9737例患者的重叠样本中对创伤干预需求进行了测试。NFTI+与更高的创伤急救启动水平、年龄较大、ISS较高、ED生命体征较差、住院时间较长以及死亡率相关。561例死亡患者中只有13例不是NFTI+,且所有这些患者都有“不要复苏”(DNR)医嘱;使用ISS大于15会漏诊73例死亡病例,其中46例有DNR医嘱。结果表明,只要护理团队调整治疗方案,NFTI就能以一种自我调整年龄、虚弱程度和合并症的方式,全面反映解剖学和生理学情况。创伤干预需求似乎是一种独特、简单且有效的工具,可用于回顾性识别重大创伤,而无需考虑ISS。

相似文献

1
Asking a Better Question: Development and Evaluation of the Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) Metric as a Novel Indicator of Major Trauma.提出更好的问题:创伤干预需求(NFTI)指标作为重大创伤新指标的开发与评估
J Trauma Nurs. 2017 May/Jun;24(3):150-157. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000283.
2
Rethinking the definition of major trauma: The need for trauma intervention outperforms Injury Severity Score and Revised Trauma Score in 38 adult and pediatric trauma centers.重新思考严重创伤的定义:在 38 家成人和儿科创伤中心,创伤干预的需要优于损伤严重度评分和修正创伤评分。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Sep;87(3):658-665. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002402.
3
Validation of new trauma triage rules for trauma attending response to the emergency department.急诊科创伤主治医生应对新创伤分诊规则的验证
J Trauma. 2002 Jun;52(6):1153-8; discussion 1158-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200206000-00022.
4
Is ventilator-associated pneumonia in trauma patients an epiphenomenon or a cause of death?创伤患者的呼吸机相关性肺炎是一种附带现象还是死亡原因?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2004 Fall;5(3):237-42. doi: 10.1089/sur.2004.5.237.
5
Combining Cribari matrix and Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) to accurately assess undertriage in pediatric trauma.结合 Cribari 矩阵和创伤干预需求(NFTI)来准确评估儿科创伤中的分诊不足。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Aug;56(8):1401-1404. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.08.013. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
6
The impact of implementing a 24/7 open trauma bed protocol in the surgical intensive care unit on throughput and outcomes.24/7 开放创伤床位协议在外科重症监护病房对吞吐量和结果的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):97-101. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829849e5.
7
Enhanced trauma program commitment at a level I trauma center: effect on the process and outcome of care.一级创伤中心加强创伤项目投入:对护理过程及结果的影响
Arch Surg. 2003 Aug;138(8):838-43. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.8.838.
8
Early tracheostomy in intensive care trauma patients improves resource utilization: a cohort study and literature review.重症监护创伤患者早期气管切开术可提高资源利用率:一项队列研究及文献综述
Crit Care. 2004 Oct;8(5):R347-52. doi: 10.1186/cc2924. Epub 2004 Aug 23.
9
Assessing Effectiveness and Efficiency of Need for Trauma Intervention (NFTI) and Modified NFTI in Identifying Overtriage and Undertriage Rates and Associated Outcomes.评估创伤干预需求(NFTI)及改良NFTI在识别过度分诊和分诊不足率及相关结果方面的有效性和效率。
Am Surg. 2023 Dec;89(12):6181-6189. doi: 10.1177/00031348231191225. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
10
The new injury severity score is a better predictor of extended hospitalization and intensive care unit admission than the injury severity score in patients with multiple orthopaedic injuries.对于多发骨科损伤患者,新损伤严重程度评分比损伤严重程度评分更能预测延长住院时间和入住重症监护病房的情况。
J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Aug;17(7):508-12. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200308000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation and Implication of Case Volume Variation in Level 1 and 2 Trauma Centers.一级和二级创伤中心病例数量变化的评估及其影响
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Jun 12;6(2):e589. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000589. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
EMCC dispatch priority for trauma patients in Norway: a retrospective cohort study.挪威创伤患者的急诊医疗通信中心调度优先级:一项回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 May 12;33(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01387-2.
3
Predicting the Need for Tertiary Trauma Care Using a Multivariable Model: A 4-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.
使用多变量模型预测三级创伤护理需求:一项4年回顾性队列研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 10;13(1):e37. doi: 10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2581. eCollection 2025.
4
Impact of nonphysician, technology-guided alert level selection on rates of appropriate trauma triage in the United States: a before and after study.非医师主导的技术引导警报级别选择对美国适当创伤分诊率的影响:一项前后对照研究。
J Trauma Inj. 2023 Sep;36(3):231-241. doi: 10.20408/jti.2023.0020. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
5
Evaluation of Prehospital Undertriage in Relation to Trauma Team Activation-Results from a Prospective Study in 12 Level one German Trauma Centers.德国12家一级创伤中心前瞻性研究中与创伤团队启动相关的院前分诊评估结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 16;13(6):1714. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061714.
6
A Canadian consensus-based list of urgent and specialized in-hospital trauma care interventions to assess the accuracy of prehospital trauma triage protocols: a modified Delphi study.一项基于加拿大共识的紧急和专科院内创伤救治干预措施清单,用以评估创伤院前分诊预案的准确性:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Can J Surg. 2023 Mar 31;66(2):E181-E188. doi: 10.1503/cjs.019920. Print 2023 Mar-Apr.
7
Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.创伤患者休克指数预测大量输血和死亡率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 5;27(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04386-w.
8
Evaluation of activation criteria in paediatric multi-trauma.儿童多发伤中激活标准的评估
Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Oct 13;28(1):17-23. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxac085. eCollection 2023 Feb.
9
Refining triage practices by predicting the need for emergent care following major trauma: the experience of a level 1 adult trauma center.通过预测重大创伤后紧急护理的需求来完善分诊实践:1 级成人创伤中心的经验。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug;49(4):1717-1725. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02195-4. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
10
ISS alone, is not sufficient to correctly assign patients post hoc to trauma team requirement.ISS 单独使用不足以正确地将患者事后分配到创伤小组的需求。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb;48(1):383-392. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01410-4. Epub 2020 Jun 16.