Yorio J M, Dishman R K, Forbus W R, Cureton K J, Graham R E
Exercise Psychology Lab, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992 Aug;24(8):860-7.
We examined ratings of breathlessness (BRE) as a predictor of perceived exertion (RPE) during incremental cycling at power outputs of 50, 75, and 100 W. Young females (21 yr +/- 1.9) diagnosed with mild asthma (N = 25) were compared with females having normal lung function (N = 25) matched for age, VO2peak, trait anxiety, activity history (7-d recall), and BMI (kg.m-2). Relative oxygen consumption (%VO2peak), blood lactate concentration, VE.VO2(-1), and state anxiety were statistically controlled in hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses. For each group, %VO2peak explained 60% of the variance in RPE across power outputs (P less than 0.001); R2 was unchanged (P greater than 0.10) with the addition of blood lactate, VE.VO2(-1), and state anxiety. Absolute RPE and BRE did not differ between groups at any power output, but partial standardized (beta) and unstandardized (b) regression coefficients and increases in R2 showed that BRE had a greater effect (P less than 0.01) on RPE for asthmatics [adjusted R2 increased to 0.89; (beta) = 0.75; (b) = 0.79 +/- 0.06] than for controls [adjusted R2 increased to 0.74; (beta) = 0.52; (b) = 0.51 +/- 0.09]. The standard error of the prediction was 0.79 for asthmatics and 1.16 for controls. The prediction of RPE by BRE was not moderated by variation in forced expiratory volume for 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) or peak inspiratory flow (VI). Physiological responses were similar for the groups, but blood lactate was higher in asthmatics at rest, at each power output, and at VO2peak.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们研究了在功率输出为50、75和100瓦的递增式骑行过程中,气喘评级(BRE)作为感知运动强度(RPE)预测指标的情况。将25名被诊断为轻度哮喘的年轻女性(21岁±1.9岁)与25名年龄、峰值摄氧量、特质焦虑、活动史(7天回忆)和体重指数(kg·m-2)相匹配的肺功能正常的女性进行比较。在分层多元线性回归分析中,对相对耗氧量(%VO2peak)、血乳酸浓度、VE.VO2(-1)和状态焦虑进行了统计学控制。对于每组,%VO2peak解释了不同功率输出下RPE变异的60%(P<0.001);加入血乳酸、VE.VO2(-1)和状态焦虑后,R2无变化(P>0.10)。在任何功率输出下,两组之间的绝对RPE和BRE均无差异,但偏标准化(β)和非标准化(b)回归系数以及R2的增加表明,与对照组相比,BRE对哮喘患者的RPE影响更大(P<0.01)[调整后的R2增至0.89;(β)=0.75;(b)=0.79±0.06],而对照组[调整后的R2增至0.74;(β)=0.52;(b)=0.51±0.09]。哮喘患者的预测标准误差为0.79,对照组为1.16。1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)或最大吸气流量(VI)的变化并未调节BRE对RPE的预测。两组的生理反应相似,但哮喘患者在静息、各功率输出及VO2peak时的血乳酸水平更高。(摘要截断于250字)