Fawcett A J, Nicolson R I
Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK.
Percept Mot Skills. 1992 Oct;75(2):507-29. doi: 10.2466/pms.1992.75.2.507.
Traditional theories of dyslexia have focused on components of the reading process. The Dyslexic Automatisation Deficit hypothesis takes a broader view, attributing deficits to an inability to become completely fluent in cognitive and motor skills. A series of experiments compared the balance of 15-yr.-old and 11-yr.-old groups of dyslexic children and normal children matched for age and IQ under single-task and dual-task conditions. There were no group differences in the single-task conditions. However, introduction of a concurrent secondary task led to a dissociation in that, whereas the balance of normal children was unaffected, the dyslexic children's balance was significantly impaired. It was concluded that the normal children balanced automatically whereas the dyslexic children did not. These results directly support the proposed framework.
传统的诵读困难理论聚焦于阅读过程的各个组成部分。诵读困难自动化缺陷假说则采取了更宽泛的视角,将缺陷归因于无法在认知和运动技能方面达到完全流畅的程度。一系列实验比较了15岁和11岁的诵读困难儿童组与在年龄和智商方面相匹配的正常儿童组在单任务和双任务条件下的平衡能力。在单任务条件下,两组之间没有差异。然而,引入一个并发的次要任务导致了一种分离现象,即正常儿童的平衡能力未受影响,而诵读困难儿童的平衡能力则显著受损。得出的结论是,正常儿童能自动保持平衡,而诵读困难儿童则不能。这些结果直接支持了所提出的框架。