Masini R, Sciaky R, Pascarella A
Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Italy.
Percept Psychophys. 1992 Sep;52(3):235-42. doi: 10.3758/bf03209141.
In the present experiments, we attempted to evaluate the modification of the strength of the Poggendorff illusion as a function of the different orientation of a parallel-line texture filling the space between the vertical lines. In Experiment 1, the standard version of the Poggendorff configuration was tested against four different parallel-line textures oriented at 0 degrees, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, and 135 degrees with respect to the obliques. The results showed that the illusory effect was a linear function of the progressive discrepancy between the angle of the lines of the texture and that of the obliques. In Experiment 2, we tested the same textures used in Experiment 1 after the elimination of the two vertical lines. The data obtained approximated a linear function, as in the previous experiment, but the alignment errors were consistently lower. The statistical analysis performed on the data of all eight experimental conditions shows that both factors--texture and presence/absence of verticals--were significant, but most of the effect was due to the texture factor. The results may be interpreted through the "perceptual compromise hypothesis," originally proposed for the bisection forms of the Poggendorff illusion, but with important modifications. The data are also discussed in terms of their implications for other theories proposed for the Poggendorff illusion.
在当前实验中,我们试图评估波根多夫错觉强度的变化,该变化是填充垂直线之间空间的平行线纹理不同方向的函数。在实验1中,对波根多夫配置的标准版本与相对于斜线呈0度、45度、90度和135度方向的四种不同平行线纹理进行了测试。结果表明,错觉效应是纹理线角度与斜线角度之间逐渐差异的线性函数。在实验2中,我们在消除两条垂直线后测试了与实验1中相同的纹理。与前一个实验一样,获得的数据近似于线性函数,但对齐误差始终较低。对所有八个实验条件的数据进行的统计分析表明,纹理和垂直线的存在/缺失这两个因素均具有显著性,但大部分效应归因于纹理因素。这些结果可以通过最初为波根多夫错觉的二等分形式提出,但有重要修改的“感知折衷假设”来解释。还根据这些数据对为波根多夫错觉提出的其他理论的影响进行了讨论。