Day R H, Stecher E J, Parker A L
Department of Psychology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Perception. 1992;21(5):599-610. doi: 10.1068/p210599.
An explanation of the Poggendorff misalignment effect in terms of apparent contraction of interparallel extent resulting from the Müller-Lyer illusion was tested in three experiments. Three of the eight stimulus figures had oblique transversals outside the parallels in the usual way, three had them inside, and two were controls consisting of the transversals only. Müller-Lyer forms were differently delineated between the parallels for the inside-transversal and outside-transversal figures, and were not delineated in the control figures. In the first experiment apparent misalignment occurred in four of the six parallel-line figures and in neither of the controls. In the second experiment oblique extent between the parallels was underestimated in six of the eight figures and right-angle extent was overestimated in all of them. The results of the third experiment showed that right-angle (horizontal) extent between the parallels without transversals is estimated without significant error. The data from the three experiments do not support the interparallel-extent explanation of apparent misalignment. Instead, the results are interpreted in terms of independent perceptual compromises, one involving alignment of the transversals and the other the distance between them.
在三个实验中,对一种关于波根多夫错位效应的解释进行了测试,该解释认为这是由于缪勒-莱尔错觉导致平行线段间的视在收缩。八个刺激图形中有三个以常规方式在平行线外部有倾斜横线,三个在平行线内部有倾斜横线,另外两个是仅由横线组成的对照图形。对于内部横线和外部横线图形,在平行线之间以不同方式描绘了缪勒-莱尔图形,而对照图形中没有描绘。在第一个实验中,六个平行线图形中有四个出现了明显的错位,而两个对照图形均未出现。在第二个实验中,八个图形中有六个低估了平行线之间的倾斜长度,并且所有图形都高估了直角长度。第三个实验的结果表明,没有横线的平行线之间的直角(水平)长度估计没有显著误差。这三个实验的数据不支持对视在错位的平行线段间长度解释。相反,这些结果是根据独立的感知折衷来解释的,一种涉及横线的对齐,另一种涉及它们之间的距离。