• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病诊断在法医环境中的应用与可靠性。

The use and reliability of psychiatric diagnosis in forensic settings.

作者信息

Reid W H, Wise M, Sutton B

机构信息

Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, Austin.

出版信息

Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1992 Sep;15(3):529-37.

PMID:1409018
Abstract

The clinical professional encounters conflict whenever he or she enters the courtroom. The psychiatrist's approach must not be simply diagnostic or simply legal. We cannot shed our clinical identity; indeed, the court depends on our clinical identity and expertise in its search for the truth. The psychiatric expert must be able to translate his or her findings for the court, but these findings must come from clinical experience, not some solely legal perspective. The legal system needs our knowledge about the interfaces of mental illness, function, and behavior. After we provide our opinions, however, the legal issues must be left to the lawyers and the final determinations left to the judge or jury.

摘要

临床专业人员每当踏入法庭时都会面临冲突。精神科医生的方法不能仅仅是诊断性的,也不能仅仅是法律性的。我们不能抛开我们的临床身份;事实上,法庭在寻求真相的过程中依赖于我们的临床身份和专业知识。精神科专家必须能够向法庭阐释其调查结果,但这些结果必须来自临床经验,而不是某种单一的法律视角。法律系统需要我们关于精神疾病、功能和行为之间相互关系的知识。然而,在我们提供意见之后,法律问题必须留给律师,最终的裁决则留给法官或陪审团。

相似文献

1
The use and reliability of psychiatric diagnosis in forensic settings.精神病诊断在法医环境中的应用与可靠性。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1992 Sep;15(3):529-37.
2
AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.美国精神病学与法律学会关于提出精神错乱抗辩的被告的法医精神病学评估实践指南。美国精神病学与法律学会。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2002;30(2 Suppl):S3-40.
3
[Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].[精神状态与刑事责任——波兰及其他国家的法律法规与医学标准]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2009 Oct-Dec;59(4):309-19.
4
Legal outcome and clinical findings: a study of insanity evaluations.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1984;12(1):75-83.
5
Clinical symptom presentation in suspected malingerers: an empirical investigation.疑似诈病者的临床症状表现:一项实证研究。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1998;26(4):579-85.
6
[Forensic psychiatry: contradictions between clinical practice and justice].[法医精神病学:临床实践与司法之间的矛盾]
Psychiatr Prax. 1988 Mar;15(2):37-42.
7
[Complex expertise on the psychiatric health of a criminal].[关于罪犯精神健康的复杂专业知识]
Psychiatr Pol. 2006 Jan-Feb;40(1):5-17.
8
Reassessing the aftercare treatment of individuals found not guilty due to a mental disability in Hunan, China: supplemental study into the disposition of mentally ill offenders after forensic psychiatric assessment.重新评估中国湖南因精神残疾而被判定无罪者的后续护理治疗:法医精神病学评估后对精神病罪犯处置的补充研究
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;41(4):337-42. doi: 10.1080/00048670701213252.
9
Ethical issues in forensic psychiatry: from an attorney's perspective.法医精神病学中的伦理问题:从律师的视角看
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1984;12(3):253-61.
10
The use of psychiatric diagnoses in the legal process: task force report of the American Psychiatric Association.精神病诊断在法律程序中的应用:美国精神病学协会特别工作组报告
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1992;20(4):481-99.