Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术后复发性和残余狭窄的自然病史:对术后监测和手术管理的意义。

Natural history of recurrent and residual stenosis after carotid endarterectomy: implications for postoperative surveillance and surgical management.

作者信息

Ricotta J J, O'Brien M S, DeWeese J A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, State University of New York at Buffalo 14209.

出版信息

Surgery. 1992 Oct;112(4):656-61; discussion 662-3.

PMID:1411935
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive surveillance of patients after carotid endarterectomy is practiced routinely to detect recurrent stenoses. Many authors advocate repair of asymptomatic severe stenoses so detected. The likelihood of these lesions causing neurologic symptoms is unknown. Our aims were to (1) define the incidence of lesions, (2) determine the frequency of associated neurologic symptoms, and (3) identify patient-dependent factors that might predict restenosis.

METHODS

Data on the status of 449 carotid arteries after endarterectomy were reviewed. The number of recurrent and residual severe (greater than or equal to 80%) stenoses was identified. Interval to development of symptoms was determined by life-table analysis. Patient-dependent factors (age, gender, smoking, diabetes, and patch closure) were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis to identify possible associations with severe lesions.

RESULTS

Severe (greater than or equal to 80%) stenoses were seen in 35 patients (7.9%). Residual lesions were seen in 17 cases (eight occlusions and nine stenoses); recurrent lesions were identified in 18 patients (3.9%). Symptoms developed in five cases (14%) (one residual and four recurrent) 35, 48, 68, 98, and 103 months after surgery. The likelihood of developing symptoms associated with stenosis at 5 years was 6%. No factors correlated with residual stenosis. Age less than 60 years, female gender, primary closure, and absence of diabetes were more common in patients with recurrent lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe lesions can be found after carotid endarterectomy in at least 8% of patients and consist of residual defects, as well as recurrent stenoses. Recurrent lesions are more common in specific patient subgroups. These lesions are stable for long periods and the majority remain asymptomatic. Operation is not indicated unless symptoms develop in these patients. Intraoperative completion evaluation may be indicated to reduce the incidence of residual disease. Early noninvasive evaluation is useful as a quality-control measure. Repeated surveillance may provide data on the course of restenosis or contralateral disease progression but is of limited clinical benefit.

摘要

背景

颈动脉内膜切除术后对患者进行无创监测已成为常规操作,以检测复发狭窄情况。许多作者主张对检测出的无症状重度狭窄进行修复。这些病变导致神经症状的可能性尚不清楚。我们的目的是:(1)确定病变的发生率;(2)确定相关神经症状的发生率;(3)识别可能预测再狭窄的患者相关因素。

方法

回顾了449例颈动脉内膜切除术后颈动脉的状况数据。确定复发和残余重度(大于或等于80%)狭窄的数量。通过寿命表分析确定出现症状的时间间隔。通过单因素和多因素分析评估患者相关因素(年龄、性别、吸烟、糖尿病和补片封闭),以确定与重度病变可能存在的关联。

结果

35例患者(7.9%)出现重度(大于或等于80%)狭窄。17例出现残余病变(8例闭塞和9例狭窄);18例患者(3.9%)出现复发病变。5例(14%)在术后35、48、68、98和103个月出现症状(1例残余病变和4例复发病变)。5年时出现与狭窄相关症状的可能性为6%。没有因素与残余狭窄相关。复发病变患者中年龄小于60岁、女性、一期缝合以及无糖尿病更为常见。

结论

颈动脉内膜切除术后至少8%的患者可发现重度病变,包括残余缺损以及复发狭窄。复发病变在特定患者亚组中更为常见。这些病变长期稳定,大多数仍无症状。除非这些患者出现症状,否则不建议手术。可能需要进行术中完成评估以降低残余疾病的发生率。早期无创评估作为质量控制措施是有用的。重复监测可能提供有关再狭窄过程或对侧疾病进展的数据,但临床益处有限。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验