Suppr超能文献

患者年龄对颈动脉内膜切除术预后的影响:韩国一项单中心回顾性研究。

Effects of patient age on outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: A retrospective, single-center study in Korea.

作者信息

Jeong Min-Jae, Kwon Sun U, Kim Min-Ju, Han Youngjin, Kwon Tae-Won, Cho Yong-Pil

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery.

Departments of Neurology.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(32):e16781. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016781.

Abstract

In this single-center, retrospective study, we aimed to compare early and late outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) between younger and elderly patients and to investigate the impact of patient age on the overall incidence of cardiovascular events after CEA.A total of 613 patients with 675 CEAs between January 2007 and December 2014 were stratified by patient age into 2 groups: younger (≤60 years, n = 103 CEAs, 15.3%) and elderly (>60 years, n = 572 CEAs, 84.7%) groups. The study outcomes were defined as the occurrence of major adverse events (MAEs), including fatal or nonfatal stroke or myocardial infarction (MI), or any-cause mortality, and overall cardiovascular events (meaning the composite incidence of stroke or MI) during the perioperative period and within 4 years after CEA.Although there were no significant differences in the incidence of 30-day MAEs and any of the individual MAE manifestations between the 2 groups, the differences in the MAE incidence (P = .006) and any-cause mortality (P = .023) within 4 years after CEA were significantly greater in patients in the elderly group. For overall incidence of cardiovascular events, no significant difference was noted between the 2 groups (P = .096). On multivariate analysis, older age (>60 years) did not affect the incidence of perioperative MAEs and individual MAE manifestations; however, older age was significantly associated with an increased risk of 4-year MAEs (hazard ratio [HR], 3.68, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-10.0; P = .011) and any-cause mortality (HR, 3.26, 95% CI, 1.02-10.5; P = .047). With regard to the 4-year overall incidence of cardiovascular events, older age was not an independent predictor of increased risk of these cardiovascular events.Our study indicates that the risks of perioperative MAEs and the 4-year overall incidence of cardiovascular events do not significantly differ between younger and elderly Korean patients undergoing CEA, although there was a higher risk of 4-year any-cause mortality in the elderly patients. Older age does not appear to be an independent risk factor for perioperative MAEs and overall cardiovascular events within 4 years after CEA.

摘要

在这项单中心回顾性研究中,我们旨在比较年轻和老年患者行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的早期和晚期结局,并研究患者年龄对CEA后心血管事件总体发生率的影响。2007年1月至2014年12月期间,共有613例患者接受了675次CEA手术,根据患者年龄分为两组:年轻组(≤60岁,103例CEA手术,占15.3%)和老年组(>60岁,572例CEA手术,占84.7%)。研究结局定义为围手术期及CEA术后4年内发生的主要不良事件(MAE),包括致命或非致命性中风或心肌梗死(MI),或任何原因导致的死亡,以及总体心血管事件(指中风或MI的综合发生率)。尽管两组之间30天MAE发生率及任何个体MAE表现的发生率无显著差异,但老年组患者CEA术后4年内MAE发生率(P = 0.006)及任何原因导致的死亡率(P = 0.023)的差异显著更大。对于心血管事件的总体发生率,两组之间无显著差异(P = 0.096)。多因素分析显示,年龄较大(>60岁)并不影响围手术期MAE及个体MAE表现的发生率;然而,年龄较大与4年MAE风险增加显著相关(风险比[HR],3.68,95%置信区间[CI],1.35 - 10.0;P = 0.011)及任何原因导致的死亡率(HR,3.26,95%CI,1.02 - 10.5;P = 0.047)。关于4年心血管事件的总体发生率,年龄较大并非这些心血管事件风险增加的独立预测因素。我们的研究表明,接受CEA手术的韩国年轻和老年患者围手术期MAE风险及4年心血管事件总体发生率无显著差异,尽管老年患者4年任何原因导致的死亡率风险较高。年龄较大似乎并非CEA术后4年内围手术期MAE及总体心血管事件的独立危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f41c/6708719/f79fa569a15e/medi-98-e16781-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验