• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纽约市“大哥哥/大姐姐”项目家长评估情况

An evaluation of parental assessment of the Big Brothers/Big Sisters program in New York City.

作者信息

Frecknall P, Luks A

机构信息

New York University, Department of Communications, New York 10003.

出版信息

Adolescence. 1992 Fall;27(107):715-8.

PMID:1414581
Abstract

This study used a self-report survey to assess parents' impressions of the impact of the Big Brothers/Big Sisters program on their children. Parents rated program success on each of seven outcome variables (school attendance, grades, getting along with family members, getting along with friends, self-esteem, staying out of trouble, and being more responsible), and two program variables (frequency of contact and length of time in program). While children were rated by their parents as benefiting significantly from the program, children's frequency of contact did not have a significant effect on the outcome measures. However, a trend of increased success with greater time spent in the program was found. Frequency of contact between parents and Big Brothers/Big Sisters was positively correlated with reported success.

摘要

本研究采用自我报告调查来评估家长对“大哥哥/大姐姐”项目对其子女影响的看法。家长对七个结果变量(出勤率、成绩、与家庭成员相处、与朋友相处、自尊、远离麻烦以及更有责任感)以及两个项目变量(接触频率和参与项目的时长)的项目成效进行评分。虽然家长认为孩子从该项目中受益匪浅,但孩子的接触频率对结果指标并无显著影响。然而,研究发现参与项目时间越长,成效增加的趋势越明显。家长与“大哥哥/大姐姐”之间的接触频率与报告的成效呈正相关。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of parental assessment of the Big Brothers/Big Sisters program in New York City.纽约市“大哥哥/大姐姐”项目家长评估情况
Adolescence. 1992 Fall;27(107):715-8.
2
Pilot of "Families for Health": community-based family intervention for obesity.“健康家庭”试点项目:基于社区的肥胖家庭干预措施
Arch Dis Child. 2008 Nov;93(11):921-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.139162. Epub 2008 May 7.
3
Attitudes about AIDS education and condom availability among parents of high school students in New York City: a focus group approach.纽约市高中生家长对艾滋病教育及避孕套可得性的态度:焦点小组研究方法
AIDS Educ Prev. 1997 Feb;9(1):14-30.
4
Evaluation of an intergenerational program for pregnant and parenting adolescents.针对怀孕及育有子女的青少年的代际项目评估。
Matern Child Nurs J. 1996 Jan-Mar;24(1):32-40.
5
[Candid, not monitored children run less risk of becoming delinquent].坦率地说,未受监管的儿童犯罪风险较低。 (注:你提供的原文可能不太准确,推测正确内容翻译后是这样,若原文有误请及时告知。)
Lakartidningen. 2001 Jun 20;98(25):3009-13.
6
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
7
An initial evaluation of a mindful parenting program.一项正念养育计划的初步评估。
J Clin Psychol. 2007 Dec;63(12):1231-8. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20395.
8
Mentoring in schools: an impact study of big brothers big sisters school-based mentoring.学校辅导:大哥哥大姐姐学校辅导的影响研究。
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):346-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01559.x.
9
The evolution of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in New York: changing program features and enrollee characteristics.纽约州儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)的发展:项目特征与参保人特点的变化
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e542.
10
Parents' perceptions of the value of the Webster-Stratton Parenting Programme: a qualitative study of a general practice based initiative.父母对韦伯斯特-斯特拉顿育儿计划价值的看法:一项基于全科医疗的倡议的定性研究。
Child Care Health Dev. 2005 Jan;31(1):53-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00479.x.