Hellinger W C, Rouse M S, Rabadan P M, Henry N K, Steckelberg J M, Wilson W R
Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida 32224.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Jun;36(6):1272-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.6.1272.
We studied the efficacy of continuous intravenous infusion of ampicillin compared with that of intermittent administration of ampicillin alone or in combination with gentamicin for the therapy of highly aminoglycoside-resistant enterococcal experimental endocarditis. Rabbits were infected with a gentamicin-susceptible (MIC, 256 micrograms/ml) strain of Enterococcus faecalis or a strain of E. faecalis which was highly resistant to gentamicin in vitro (MIC, greater than 2,000 micrograms/ml). Administration of ampicillin by continuous intravenous infusion did not significantly enhance the killing of enterococci in vivo compared with that by intermittent administration of ampicillin for either the aminoglycoside-susceptible or the aminoglycoside-resistant strain. In combination with gentamicin, there were no significant differences in efficacies obtained with intermittent versus continuous intravenous infusion of ampicillin therapy for experimental endocarditis caused by either strain of E. faecalis.
我们研究了持续静脉输注氨苄西林与单独间歇性给予氨苄西林或联合庆大霉素治疗对氨基糖苷类高度耐药的肠球菌性实验性心内膜炎的疗效。将兔子感染对庆大霉素敏感(MIC,256微克/毫升)的粪肠球菌菌株或体外对庆大霉素高度耐药(MIC,大于2000微克/毫升)的粪肠球菌菌株。对于氨基糖苷类敏感或耐药菌株,与间歇性给予氨苄西林相比,持续静脉输注氨苄西林在体内对肠球菌的杀灭作用没有显著增强。对于由任何一种粪肠球菌菌株引起的实验性心内膜炎,在联合庆大霉素治疗时,间歇性与持续静脉输注氨苄西林治疗的疗效没有显著差异。