Horne C, Stenzhorn G, Blume H, Knauf H, Mutschler E
Pharmakologisches Institut für Naturwissenschaftler, University, Frankfurt/M., FRG.
Arch Pharm (Weinheim). 1992 Aug;325(8):531-6. doi: 10.1002/ardp.19923250814.
Relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of two oral verapamil preparations were investigated (dosage 80 mg, film-coated tablets as reference, dragées as test formulation). The clinical study was performed in a 2-period-cross-over design with 16 male healthy volunteers (mean age 28.8 +/- 3 years). The active metabolite norverapamil was included in the investigation. To assess bioequivalence several pharmacokinetic characteristics (i.e. AUC(o-oo), Cmax, tmax) were taken into account. Shortest 90% confidence intervals were calculated based on parametric (ANOVA, ANOVAlog) and non-parametric (Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney) statistical tests. A positive decision for bioequivalence was accepted if the confidence intervals did not exceed the limits of 80-120% for AUC and 70-130% for Cmax. A mean relative bioavailability of 127% for the test preparation was found. Thus, bioavailability of the dragées is marked higher than bioavailability of the film-coated tablets.
研究了两种口服维拉帕米制剂的相对生物利用度和生物等效性(剂量80毫克,以薄膜包衣片为参比制剂,糖衣片为受试制剂)。临床研究采用两周期交叉设计,纳入16名男性健康志愿者(平均年龄28.8±3岁)。研究中包括了活性代谢物去甲维拉帕米。为评估生物等效性,考虑了几个药代动力学特征(即AUC(0-∞)、Cmax、tmax)。基于参数统计检验(方差分析、对数方差分析)和非参数统计检验(威尔科克森检验、曼-惠特尼检验)计算最短90%置信区间。如果AUC的置信区间不超过80%-120%的限度,Cmax的置信区间不超过70%-130%的限度,则判定生物等效性为阳性。受试制剂的平均相对生物利用度为127%。因此,糖衣片的生物利用度明显高于薄膜包衣片。