Xin Y, Rosman A S, Lasker J M, Lieber C S
Alcohol Research & Treatment Center, Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center, NY.
Alcohol Alcohol. 1992 Jul;27(4):425-33.
At present, the most reliable marker of recent and heavy alcohol intake is carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT). While most CDT quantitation methods (including immunofixation and micro anion-exchange chromatography [MAEC] combined with radioimmunoassay [RIA]) either lack the precision required for diagnostic usage or are not commercially available, we recently described an isoelectric focusing/Western blotting (IEF/WB) procedure that provides sensitive and specific assessment of serum CDT content. However, a modified MAEC/RIA kit, supposedly more reliable than the original, is also being advanced as suitable for widespread clinical application. Therefore, we compared this modified MAEC/RIA procedure to the IEF/WB method of CDT quantitation in the following 108 subjects; 53 alcoholics undergoing detoxification without clinical or histological evidence of liver disease, 24 recently drinking alcoholics with biopsy-proven liver disease, eight alcoholics abstinent for more than 30 days with biopsy-proven liver disease, seven non-drinking patients with non-alcoholic liver disease, and 16 healthy controls. Although CDT measurements by the two methods were correlated (r = 0.60, P < 0.01), serum CDT values obtained with IEF/WB were nearly five-fold higher than those obtained with MAEC/RIA (e.g. 140.0 +/- 58 versus 28.5 +/- 16 mg/l among the active drinkers). Of the two methods, IEF/WB exhibited significantly greater sensitivity than MAEC/RIA for detecting recent, heavy drinking (75% versus 61%, P < 0.05) and generated no false positives whereas MAEC/RIA gave falsely elevated CDT levels in 37% of the abstinent alcoholics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
目前,近期大量饮酒最可靠的标志物是缺糖转铁蛋白(CDT)。虽然大多数CDT定量方法(包括免疫固定法以及结合放射免疫分析[RIA]的微阴离子交换色谱法[MAEC])要么缺乏诊断应用所需的精度,要么没有商业供应,但我们最近描述了一种等电聚焦/蛋白质印迹法(IEF/WB),该方法可对血清CDT含量进行灵敏且特异的评估。然而,一种据称比原始试剂盒更可靠的改良MAEC/RIA试剂盒也正在推广,适用于广泛的临床应用。因此,我们在以下108名受试者中,将这种改良的MAEC/RIA方法与CDT定量的IEF/WB方法进行了比较;53名正在戒酒且无肝脏疾病临床或组织学证据的酗酒者,24名近期饮酒且经活检证实有肝脏疾病的酗酒者,8名戒酒超过30天且经活检证实有肝脏疾病的酗酒者,7名患有非酒精性肝病的非饮酒患者,以及16名健康对照者。虽然两种方法测得的CDT值具有相关性(r = 0.60,P < 0.01),但IEF/WB测得的血清CDT值几乎比MAEC/RIA测得的值高五倍(例如,在活跃饮酒者中,分别为140.0±58和28.5±16 mg/l)。在这两种方法中,IEF/WB在检测近期大量饮酒方面的灵敏度显著高于MAEC/RIA(75%对61%,P < 0.05),且未产生假阳性结果,而MAEC/RIA在37%的戒酒酗酒者中给出了错误升高的CDT水平。(摘要截取自250字)