Suppr超能文献

[使用光盘的比较言语听力测定研究]

[Comparative speech audiometry studies with compact disk].

作者信息

Plath P, Doerr L

机构信息

Klinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenkrankheiten, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.

出版信息

Laryngorhinootologie. 1992 Oct;71(10):530-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997348.

Abstract

We compared the results of speech audiometry, performed with recorded tape and CD, respectively, in 21 subjects with bone conduction hearing loss, and in 27 subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. In all cases, speech audiometry was performed by using the German Freiburg speech test material, recorded in 1969 on the basis of the German DIN standard 45626. In subjects with an air-bone gap, the hearing loss for speech is 2.3 dB smaller if tested by use of CD, and the speech recognition is 10.5 points better, respectively. Smaller differences could be found in sensorineural HL: For CD, the hearing loss is 1.2 dB smaller, and the speech recognition score is raised by only 1 point. These differences are statistically not significant, and the calculation of hearing impairment and individual hearing handicap from the tables commonly used in Germany in medicolegal expert opinions must not be corrected, if records on CD are used basing on the recordings from 1969 according to DIN 45626. The handling of compact discs has many advantages in relation to the handling of tapes.

摘要

我们分别对21例骨传导听力损失患者和27例感音神经性听力损失患者进行了言语测听,测试材料分别为录音带和CD。所有病例均采用1969年根据德国DIN标准45626录制的德国弗莱堡言语测试材料进行言语测听。在气骨导差的患者中,使用CD进行测试时,言语听力损失小2.3dB,言语识别率分别高10.5分。在感音神经性听力损失患者中差异较小:使用CD时,听力损失小1.2dB,言语识别分数仅提高1分。这些差异无统计学意义,如果根据DIN 45626使用1969年录制的CD记录,则在德国法医学专家意见中常用表格计算听力损害和个体听力障碍时无需校正。与磁带相比,光盘的使用有许多优点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验