• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氨苄西林-舒巴坦与克林霉素用于头颈肿瘤手术。革兰氏阴性菌覆盖的必要性。

Ampicillin-sulbactam vs clindamycin in head and neck oncologic surgery. The need for gram-negative coverage.

作者信息

Weber R S, Raad I, Frankenthaler R, Hankins P, Byers R M, Guillamondegui O, Wolf P, Smith T, Goepfert H

机构信息

Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030.

出版信息

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992 Nov;118(11):1159-63. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1992.01880110027007.

DOI:10.1001/archotol.1992.01880110027007
PMID:1418893
Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess whether gram-negative antimicrobial coverage is required in patients undergoing head and neck oncologic surgery. Ampicillin sodium-sulbactam sodium and clindamycin phosphate were compared in a prospective, randomized, parallel, double-blind trial of 212 patients undergoing head and neck procedures involving clean-contaminated wounds. Both antibiotics were given up to 1 hour before surgery and continued at 6-hour intervals after surgery for an additional eight doses. Fourteen infections occurred in the ampicillin-sulbactam-treated group (13.3%) and 29 infections in the clindamycin-treated group (27.1%). From patients receiving clindamycin, 29 gram-negative organisms were isolated, compared with six from those patients receiving ampicillin-sulbactam. This finding supports the need for gram-negative coverage in patients undergoing clean-contaminated head and neck oncologic surgery.

摘要

本研究旨在评估接受头颈肿瘤手术的患者是否需要革兰氏阴性菌抗菌覆盖。在一项前瞻性、随机、平行、双盲试验中,对212例接受涉及清洁-污染伤口的头颈手术的患者比较了氨苄西林钠舒巴坦钠和磷酸克林霉素。两种抗生素均在手术前1小时内给药,并在术后每隔6小时继续给药,共额外给药8剂。氨苄西林舒巴坦治疗组发生14例感染(13.3%),克林霉素治疗组发生29例感染(27.1%)。接受克林霉素治疗的患者分离出29株革兰氏阴性菌,而接受氨苄西林舒巴坦治疗的患者分离出6株。这一发现支持了接受清洁-污染头颈肿瘤手术的患者需要革兰氏阴性菌覆盖的观点。

相似文献

1
Ampicillin-sulbactam vs clindamycin in head and neck oncologic surgery. The need for gram-negative coverage.氨苄西林-舒巴坦与克林霉素用于头颈肿瘤手术。革兰氏阴性菌覆盖的必要性。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992 Nov;118(11):1159-63. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1992.01880110027007.
2
Antibiotic prophylaxis in head and neck oncologic surgery: the role of gram-negative coverage.头颈部肿瘤手术中的抗生素预防:革兰氏阴性菌覆盖的作用。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1999 Aug;12 Suppl 1:S21-5; discussion S26-7. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(99)00088-6.
3
Comparison of ampicillin/sulbactam versus clindamycin in the prevention of infection in patients undergoing head and neck surgery.氨苄西林/舒巴坦与克林霉素在预防头颈外科手术患者感染中的比较。
Head Neck. 1997 Aug;19(5):367-71. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199708)19:5<367::aid-hed1>3.0.co;2-y.
4
Antimicrobial prophylaxis for major head and neck surgery in cancer patients: sulbactam-ampicillin versus clindamycin-amikacin.癌症患者头颈部大手术的抗菌预防:舒巴坦-氨苄西林与克林霉素-阿米卡星的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Sep;36(9):2014-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.9.2014.
5
Nonwound infections following head and neck oncologic surgery.
Laryngoscope. 1993 Jan;103(1 Pt 1):22-7. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199301000-00006.
6
Antibiotic and Duration of Perioperative Prophylaxis Predicts Surgical Site Infection in Head and Neck Surgery.抗生素及围手术期预防用药持续时间可预测头颈外科手术部位感染
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jun;154(6):1054-63. doi: 10.1177/0194599816634303. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
7
Bacteriologic profile of surgical infection after antibiotic prophylaxis.抗生素预防后手术感染的细菌学特征
Head Neck. 1993 Nov-Dec;15(6):526-31. doi: 10.1002/hed.2880150609.
8
A randomized, double-blind comparison of ampicillin/sulbactam and ceftriaxone in the prevention of surgical-site infections after neurosurgery.氨苄西林/舒巴坦与头孢曲松预防神经外科手术后手术部位感染的随机双盲比较
Clin Ther. 2001 Aug;23(8):1281-91. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80107-7.
9
Perioperative Antibiotics in Clean-Contaminated Head and Neck Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.头颈部清洁-污染手术围手术期抗生素应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Apr;37(4):1360-1380. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01269-2. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
10
Effect of Clindamycin compared with Ampicillin-Sulbactam as prophylactic antibiotics for wound infections following major surgery for head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis.克林霉素与氨苄西林-舒巴坦预防头颈部恶性肿瘤根治术后切口感染的效果比较:Meta 分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4151-4158. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14312. Epub 2023 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Clindamycin compared with Ampicillin-Sulbactam as prophylactic antibiotics for wound infections following major surgery for head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis.克林霉素与氨苄西林-舒巴坦预防头颈部恶性肿瘤根治术后切口感染的效果比较:Meta 分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4151-4158. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14312. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
2
Perioperative Topical Antisepsis and Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Upper Aerodigestive Tract Reconstruction.上消化道重建患者的围手术期局部抗菌和手术部位感染。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Jun 1;148(6):547-554. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.0684.
3
Perioperative Antibiotics in Clean-Contaminated Head and Neck Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
头颈部清洁-污染手术围手术期抗生素应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Apr;37(4):1360-1380. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01269-2. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
4
Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated head and neck cases with microvascular free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在接受微血管游离皮瓣重建的清洁-污染性头颈部病例中使用抗生素预防:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Head Neck. 2018 Feb;40(2):417-427. doi: 10.1002/hed.24988. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
5
Evidence and evidence gaps of laryngeal cancer surgery.喉癌手术的证据与证据空白
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec 15;15:Doc03. doi: 10.3205/cto000130. eCollection 2016.
6
Antibiotic Use after Free Tissue Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects: Short Course vs. Long Course.头颈部缺损游离组织重建术后的抗生素使用:短疗程与长疗程对比
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Feb;17(1):100-5. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.131. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
Surgical errors and risks - the head and neck cancer patient.手术失误与风险——头颈癌患者
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec 13;12:Doc04. doi: 10.3205/cto000096.
8
Current indications for the use of clindamycin: A critical review.克林霉素使用的当前适应症:一项批判性综述。
Can J Infect Dis. 1998 Jan;9(1):22-8. doi: 10.1155/1998/538090.
9
Endovascular covered stent reconstruction improved the outcomes of acute carotid blowout syndrome. Experiences at a single institute.血管内覆膜支架重建术改善了急性颈动脉破裂综合征的治疗效果。单中心经验。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2008 Nov 11;14 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):23-7. doi: 10.1177/15910199080140S206. Epub 2009 Jan 2.
10
Brain abscess formation: a delayed complication of carotid blowout syndrome treated by self-expandable stent-graft.脑脓肿形成:一种经自膨式支架型人工血管治疗的颈动脉破裂综合征的迟发性并发症。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Aug;27(7):1543-5.