• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氨苄西林/舒巴坦与克林霉素在预防头颈外科手术患者感染中的比较。

Comparison of ampicillin/sulbactam versus clindamycin in the prevention of infection in patients undergoing head and neck surgery.

作者信息

Johnson J T, Kachman K, Wagner R L, Myers E N

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology and Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Head Neck. 1997 Aug;19(5):367-71. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199708)19:5<367::aid-hed1>3.0.co;2-y.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199708)19:5<367::aid-hed1>3.0.co;2-y
PMID:9243262
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients requiring major oncologic head and neck surgery are at high risk for postoperative wound infection when the surgical site is contaminated by secretions from the upper aerodigestive tract. Studies to identify agents active in the prevention of postoperative wound infection may serve to reduce patient morbidity.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for a major contaminated head and neck surgical procedure were randomly assigned to receive either ampicillin/sulbactam or clindamycin. Medication was administered 1 to 2 hours prior to surgery and every 6 hours, for a total of five doses. Postoperatively, patients were followed daily for the development of wound infection or other septic complication.

RESULTS

A total of 242 patients were enrolled in the study; 119 received ampicillin/sulbactam, and 123 received clindamycin. A total of 169 patients were considered evaluable. Of the evaluable patients, 14% in each group developed a postoperative wound infection. There were no statistically significant differences between the number of days to onset of wound infection, nor was there a statistically significant difference in the rate of non-wound infections in the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the intent to treat group and the evaluable group of patients.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that ampicillin/sulbactam is as safe and effective as clindamycin in preventing postoperative wound infection following major head and neck surgery.

摘要

背景

当手术部位被上呼吸道消化道分泌物污染时,需要进行大型肿瘤性头颈手术的患者术后伤口感染风险很高。确定预防术后伤口感染有效药物的研究可能有助于降低患者发病率。

方法

计划进行大型污染性头颈外科手术的患者被随机分配接受氨苄西林/舒巴坦或克林霉素治疗。在手术前1至2小时给药,每6小时给药一次,共给药五剂。术后,每天对患者进行随访,观察伤口感染或其他败血症并发症的发生情况。

结果

共有242例患者纳入研究;119例接受氨苄西林/舒巴坦治疗,123例接受克林霉素治疗。共有169例患者被认为可评估。在可评估的患者中,每组有14%发生了术后伤口感染。两组伤口感染发生天数无统计学显著差异,两组非伤口感染率也无统计学显著差异。意向性治疗组和可评估患者组之间无统计学显著差异。

结论

得出结论,在预防大型头颈手术后的术后伤口感染方面,氨苄西林/舒巴坦与克林霉素一样安全有效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of ampicillin/sulbactam versus clindamycin in the prevention of infection in patients undergoing head and neck surgery.氨苄西林/舒巴坦与克林霉素在预防头颈外科手术患者感染中的比较。
Head Neck. 1997 Aug;19(5):367-71. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199708)19:5<367::aid-hed1>3.0.co;2-y.
2
Ampicillin-sulbactam vs clindamycin in head and neck oncologic surgery. The need for gram-negative coverage.氨苄西林-舒巴坦与克林霉素用于头颈肿瘤手术。革兰氏阴性菌覆盖的必要性。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992 Nov;118(11):1159-63. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1992.01880110027007.
3
Antimicrobial prophylaxis for major head and neck surgery in cancer patients: sulbactam-ampicillin versus clindamycin-amikacin.癌症患者头颈部大手术的抗菌预防:舒巴坦-氨苄西林与克林霉素-阿米卡星的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Sep;36(9):2014-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.9.2014.
4
Antimicrobial prophylaxis for contaminated head and neck surgery.污染性头颈外科手术的抗菌预防
Laryngoscope. 1984 Jan;94(1):46-51. doi: 10.1002/lary.5540940111.
5
Antibiotic prophylaxis in head and neck oncologic surgery: the role of gram-negative coverage.头颈部肿瘤手术中的抗生素预防:革兰氏阴性菌覆盖的作用。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1999 Aug;12 Suppl 1:S21-5; discussion S26-7. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(99)00088-6.
6
Bacteriologic profile of surgical infection after antibiotic prophylaxis.抗生素预防后手术感染的细菌学特征
Head Neck. 1993 Nov-Dec;15(6):526-31. doi: 10.1002/hed.2880150609.
7
Antibiotic and Duration of Perioperative Prophylaxis Predicts Surgical Site Infection in Head and Neck Surgery.抗生素及围手术期预防用药持续时间可预测头颈外科手术部位感染
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jun;154(6):1054-63. doi: 10.1177/0194599816634303. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
8
Nonwound infections following head and neck oncologic surgery.
Laryngoscope. 1993 Jan;103(1 Pt 1):22-7. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199301000-00006.
9
Perioperative antibiotic use in high-risk penetrating hollow viscus injury: a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-control trial of 24 hours versus 5 days.高危穿透性中空脏器损伤围手术期抗生素的使用:一项24小时与5天的前瞻性随机双盲安慰剂对照试验
J Trauma. 2000 Nov;49(5):822-32. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200011000-00006.
10
Ampicillin-sulbactam versus cefoxitin for prophylaxis in high-risk patients undergoing abdominal surgery.氨苄西林-舒巴坦与头孢西丁用于腹部手术高危患者预防感染的比较。
Pharmacotherapy. 1994 Nov-Dec;14(6):734-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Clindamycin compared with Ampicillin-Sulbactam as prophylactic antibiotics for wound infections following major surgery for head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis.克林霉素与氨苄西林-舒巴坦预防头颈部恶性肿瘤根治术后切口感染的效果比较:Meta 分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4151-4158. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14312. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
2
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Neonates and Children Undergoing Dental, Maxillo-Facial or Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) Surgery: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study.接受牙科、颌面或耳鼻喉(ENT)手术的新生儿和儿童的抗菌药物预防:一项兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校适宜性方法共识研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Mar 13;11(3):382. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11030382.
3
Perioperative Antibiotics in Clean-Contaminated Head and Neck Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
头颈部清洁-污染手术围手术期抗生素应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Apr;37(4):1360-1380. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01269-2. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
4
Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated head and neck cases with microvascular free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在接受微血管游离皮瓣重建的清洁-污染性头颈部病例中使用抗生素预防:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Head Neck. 2018 Feb;40(2):417-427. doi: 10.1002/hed.24988. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
5
Antibiotic Use after Free Tissue Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects: Short Course vs. Long Course.头颈部缺损游离组织重建术后的抗生素使用:短疗程与长疗程对比
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Feb;17(1):100-5. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.131. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
6
[Penetrating injuries in the face and neck region. Diagnosis and treatment].[面部和颈部区域的穿透伤。诊断与治疗]
HNO. 2011 Aug;59(8):765-82. doi: 10.1007/s00106-011-2349-1.
7
Prevention and Treatment of Postsurgical Head and Neck Infections.术后头颈部感染的预防与治疗
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2004 Jun;6(3):172-180. doi: 10.1007/s11908-004-0005-6.