Suppr超能文献

在一家健康维护组织中对格列吡嗪和格列本脲的评估。

Evaluation of glipizide and glyburide in a health maintenance organization.

作者信息

Noyes M A, Carter B L, Helling D K, McCormick W C, Ramirez R

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, TX 77030.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 1992 Oct;26(10):1215-20. doi: 10.1177/106002809202601003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there was a difference in the long-term glycemic control, average daily dose, and cost of therapy in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) treated with glyburide and glipizide in a health maintenance organization (HMO).

DESIGN

Retrospective evaluation of medical and pharmacy records.

SETTING

Multispecialty group practice HMO.

PATIENTS

140 NIDDM patients being treated with either glyburide (n = 70) or glipizide (n = 70) were randomly selected from the populations of patients receiving either drug using computerized pharmacy records.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Mean daily doses and blood glucose measurements (fasting blood glucose, random blood glucose, hemoglobin A1C) were stratified in 3-month periods from the time the drug therapy was started or the patient first presented to the clinic for a total of 18 months. Long-term glycemic control was defined as fasting blood glucose less than 8.33 mmol/L (150 mg/dL).

RESULTS

The groups were comparable with regard to age (53.4 y glyburide, 56.7 y glipizide), gender (43 M:27 F glyburide, 47 M:23 F glipizide), race (38 W/16 B/16 H glyburide, 45 W/16 B/9 H glipizide), concurrent medical conditions, adverse effects, and compliance. Long-term glycemic control was similar in both groups. Although the number of subjects who were controlled (by definition) tended to be greater in the glyburide group, no clinical or statistical difference was found. There was no statistical difference in mean daily dose between the ethnic groups, but the small numbers preclude further analysis. The glipizide group had a larger percentage increase in dose within the first year than did the glyburide group; however, the percentage increase from the 3-month dose was similar after 18 months (22.7 percent glyburide, 27.5 percent glipizide.) Average daily cost of therapy, based on mean daily dose, was slightly lower for glyburide-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

If glycemic control is similar with glyburide and glipizide, as seen in this study, economic considerations regarding choice of therapy and formulary inclusion may be appropriate.

摘要

目的

确定在一家健康维护组织(HMO)中,接受格列本脲和格列吡嗪治疗的非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)患者在长期血糖控制、平均每日剂量及治疗费用方面是否存在差异。

设计

对医疗和药房记录进行回顾性评估。

地点

多专科联合执业的HMO。

患者

从使用计算机化药房记录接受这两种药物治疗的患者群体中随机选取140例NIDDM患者,其中70例接受格列本脲治疗,70例接受格列吡嗪治疗。

主要观察指标

从开始药物治疗或患者首次到诊所就诊起,在总共18个月的时间里,以3个月为周期对平均每日剂量和血糖测量值(空腹血糖、随机血糖、糖化血红蛋白A1C)进行分层。长期血糖控制定义为空腹血糖低于8.33 mmol/L(150 mg/dL)。

结果

两组在年龄(格列本脲组53.4岁,格列吡嗪组56.7岁)、性别(格列本脲组43例男性/27例女性,格列吡嗪组47例男性/23例女性)、种族(格列本脲组38例白种人/16例黑种人/16例西班牙裔,格列吡嗪组45例白种人/16例黑种人/9例西班牙裔)、并存疾病、不良反应及依从性方面具有可比性。两组的长期血糖控制相似。虽然格列本脲组中达到控制标准(根据定义)的受试者数量倾向于更多,但未发现临床或统计学差异。不同种族间平均每日剂量无统计学差异,但样本量较小无法进行进一步分析。格列吡嗪组在第一年的剂量增加百分比高于格列本脲组;然而,18个月后从3个月时的剂量开始计算,增加百分比相似(格列本脲组22.7%,格列吡嗪组27.5%)。基于平均每日剂量计算,格列本脲治疗的患者平均每日治疗费用略低。

结论

如本研究所示,如果格列本脲和格列吡嗪的血糖控制效果相似,那么在选择治疗方法和药物目录纳入方面考虑经济因素可能是合适的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验