Snodgrass G L, Pfeifer M P
Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Kentucky 40292.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1992 Oct;80(4):328-34.
During the past twenty years, more than ninety retraction notices have been published in biomedical journals. These retractions constitute a unique body of literature that biomedical researchers, bibliographers, and librarians must monitor to reduce scientific use of retracted, invalid papers. An analysis of medical retraction notices shows that very few are prominent in style, format, or placement, in spite of authoritative publication standards formulated by the International Council of Medical Journal Editors. Although researchers are ultimately responsible for the validity of the information they cite in their own publications, biomedical librarians are in a unique position to educate their patrons regarding retracted papers.
在过去的二十年里,生物医学期刊上已发表了九十多篇撤稿声明。这些撤稿声明构成了一个独特的文献集合,生物医学研究人员、文献编目人员和图书馆员必须对其进行监测,以减少对已撤稿的无效论文的科学引用。对医学撤稿声明的分析表明,尽管国际医学期刊编辑委员会制定了权威性的出版标准,但很少有撤稿声明在风格、格式或位置上引人注目。虽然研究人员最终要对他们在自己出版物中引用信息的有效性负责,但生物医学图书馆员在教育读者了解撤稿论文方面具有独特的地位。