Jougla E, Papoz L, Balkau B, Maguin P, Hatton F
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Service d'information sur les causes médicales de décès, Vésinet, France.
Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Apr;21(2):343-51. doi: 10.1093/ije/21.2.343.
The objective of this study was to compare and analyse coding practices for diabetes mortality data in nine European countries (Belgium, Republic of Ireland, France, Germany, Malta, The Netherlands, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland). In each country, a sample of 200 coded death certificates, which mentioned diabetes, was randomly sampled. All death certificates were recoded at the WHO Collaborating Centre for the Classification of Diseases in the French language. The results show wide differences between national coding and central coding. Discrepancies in the underlying cause of death existed at the 3-digit coding level for 26% of all death certificates and for 44% at the 4-digit level. Coding in Northern Ireland and Malta was characterized by a marked tendency to choose diabetes less frequently. In contrast, in The Netherlands and, to a lesser extent, in the Republic of Ireland and France, diabetes was more frequently selected as the underlying cause of death. Most of the differences concerned the coding of an association involving diabetes and circulatory system diseases. In some countries, these coding differences influence the reported level of diabetes mortality. For Northern Ireland and Malta, the number of certificates with diabetes as the underlying cause of death was more than doubled after central recoding and for The Netherlands, in contrast, it was almost halved. To explain the differences a number of factors are considered: a lack of information from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), on the application of the coding rules, between-country differences in cause of death certification practices, a divergence of opinion about the causal role of diabetes when it is associated with other conditions, a lack of homogeneity between countries in data collection procedures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究的目的是比较和分析九个欧洲国家(比利时、爱尔兰共和国、法国、德国、马耳他、荷兰、北爱尔兰、苏格兰和瑞士)糖尿病死亡率数据的编码做法。在每个国家,随机抽取了200份提及糖尿病的编码死亡证明样本。所有死亡证明均在世界卫生组织法语疾病分类合作中心重新编码。结果显示国家编码和中心编码之间存在很大差异。在所有死亡证明中,26%在3位数编码级别存在根本死因差异,44%在4位数级别存在差异。北爱尔兰和马耳他的编码特点是选择糖尿病作为根本死因的倾向明显较低。相比之下,在荷兰,以及在较小程度上在爱尔兰共和国和法国,糖尿病更常被选为根本死因。大多数差异涉及糖尿病与循环系统疾病关联的编码。在一些国家,这些编码差异影响所报告的糖尿病死亡率水平。对于北爱尔兰和马耳他,经中心重新编码后,以糖尿病为根本死因的证明数量增加了一倍多,而相比之下,荷兰的这一数量几乎减半。为了解释这些差异,考虑了多个因素:国际疾病分类(ICD)缺乏关于编码规则应用的信息、各国在死因证明做法上的差异、当糖尿病与其他病症相关联时对糖尿病因果作用的意见分歧、各国在数据收集程序上缺乏同质性。(摘要截选至250字)