• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?

作者信息

Degner L F, Sloan J A

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Sep;45(9):941-50. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9.

DOI:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9
PMID:1432023
Abstract

Two surveys were conducted to determine what roles people actually want to assume in selecting cancer treatments. 436 newly diagnosed cancer patients and 482 members of the general public participated. Preferences were elicited using two card sort procedures, each of which described five potential roles in decision making. Findings suggested that the impact of being diagnosed with a life-threatening illness may influence preferences to participate. The majority (59%) of patients wanted physicians to make treatment decisions on their behalf, but 64% of the public thought they would want to select their own treatment if they developed cancer. Most patients (51%) and members of the public (46%) wanted their physician and family to share responsibility for decision making if they were too ill to participate. Sociodemographic variables accounted for only 15% of variance in preferences. These variables are not particularly useful in making predictions about which groups want more or less active roles in medical decision making.

摘要

相似文献

1
Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Sep;45(9):941-50. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9.
2
Information and decision-making preferences of men with prostate cancer.前列腺癌男性的信息及决策偏好
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 Oct;22(9):1401-8.
3
Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences.并非所有患者都希望参与决策制定。一项关于公众偏好的全国性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jun;20(6):531-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x.
4
Clinical factors that influence patients' desire for participation in decisions about illness.影响患者参与疾病决策意愿的临床因素。
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Oct 23;160(19):2991-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.19.2991.
5
Decision-making preferences and information needs among Greek breast cancer patients.希腊乳腺癌患者的决策偏好和信息需求。
Psychooncology. 2011 Aug;20(8):871-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1798. Epub 2010 Jul 11.
6
Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?患者对医疗决策的偏好:究竟谁真正想要参与?
Med Care. 2000 Mar;38(3):335-41. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200003000-00010.
7
Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?患者是否希望参与医疗决策?
JAMA. 1984 Dec 7;252(21):2990-4.
8
Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性的信息需求与决策偏好
JAMA. 1997 May 14;277(18):1485-92.
9
Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.
Cancer Nurs. 1996 Feb;19(1):8-19. doi: 10.1097/00002820-199602000-00002.
10
Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.衡量患者对自主权的渴望:医疗患者的决策与信息寻求偏好
J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Jan-Feb;4(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02596485.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical Care Physicians' Perspectives on Nudging in Communication.重症监护医师对沟通中助推策略的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2531199. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.31199.
2
Person-centred medicine in the care home setting: feasibility testing of a complex intervention.养老院环境中的以人为本的医学:一项复杂干预措施的可行性测试
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Aug 25;26(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02925-8.
3
Black US military veterans respond favourably to a booklet using narratives to normalise shared decision-making.
美国黑人退伍军人对一本使用故事使共同决策常态化的手册反应良好。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2025 Mar 23;9:100606. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100606. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Which questionnaires can be used to elicit patients' preferences regarding patient-provider consultations? Results of a scoping review.哪些问卷可用于了解患者对医患咨询的偏好?一项范围综述的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12567-2.
5
Decision-making Preferences and Levels of Anxiety and Depression in Family Members of Patients Admitted to the ICU.重症监护病房(ICU)住院患者家属的决策偏好以及焦虑和抑郁水平
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2025 Feb;29(2):155-163. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24894. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
6
Information Behaviour and Knowledge of Patients Before Radical Prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术前患者的信息行为与知识水平
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 17;17(2):300. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020300.
7
Translation and cultural adaption of the control preference scale across various care settings in a Danish hospital.跨越丹麦医院多个护理环境的控制偏好量表的翻译与文化调适。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Aug 12;8(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00771-3.
8
Reducing decisional conflict in decisions about prenatal genetic testing: the impact of a dyadic intervention at the start of prenatal care.减少产前基因检测决策中的决策冲突:在产前保健开始时的一种双重干预的影响。
J Perinat Med. 2024 Apr 29;52(5):467-477. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2023-0442. Print 2024 Jun 25.
9
A qualitative evaluation of factors influencing Tumor Treating fields (TTFields) therapy decision making among brain tumor patients and physicians.脑肿瘤患者和医生对肿瘤治疗电场(TTFields)治疗决策影响因素的定性评价
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12042-x.
10
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.