Suppr超能文献

具有树突逐渐变细或体细胞分流的神经元中的电紧张长度估计。

Electrotonic length estimates in neurons with dendritic tapering or somatic shunt.

作者信息

Holmes W R, Rall W

机构信息

Mathematical Research Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1992 Oct;68(4):1421-37. doi: 10.1152/jn.1992.68.4.1421.

Abstract
  1. Compartmental models were used to compute the time constants and coefficients of voltage and current transients in hypothetical neurons having tapering dendrites or soma shunt and in a serially reconstructed motoneuron with soma shunt. These time constants and coefficients were used in equivalent cylinder formulas for the electrotonic length, L, of a cell to assess the magnitude of the errors that result when the equivalent cylinder formulas are applied to neurons with dendritic tapering or soma shunt. 2. Of all the formulas for a cylinder (with sealed ends), the most commonly used formula, which we call L tau 0/tau 1 (the formula uses the current-clamp time constants tau 0 and tau 1), was the most robust estimator of L in structures that tapered linearly. When the diameter at the end of the cylinder was no less than 20% of the initial diameter, L tau 0/tau 1 underestimated the actual L by at most 10%. 3. The equivalent cylinder formulas for a cylinder were applied to neurons modeled as a cylinder with a shunted soma at one end. The formula for L based solely on voltage-clamp time constants gave an exact estimate of L. However, the second voltage-clamp time constant cannot be reliably obtained experimentally for neurons studied thus far. Of the remaining formulas, L tau 0/tau 1 was again the most robust estimator of L. This formula overestimated L with the size of the overestimates depending on beta, rho beta = 1, and the actual L of the cylinder, where beta is the soma shunt factor, and rho beta = 1 is the dendritic-to-somatic conductance ratio when beta = 1 (no shunt). When the actual L was 0.5 and the soma shunt was large, this formula overestimated L by two- to threefold, but when the actual L was 1.5, the overestimate was only 10-15% regardless of the size of the shunt. 4. In neurons modeled as two cylinders with soma shunt, the L tau 0/tau 1 value computed with the actual tau 0 and tau 1 values overestimated the average L by two to six times when soma shunt was large. However, the L tau 0/tau 1 estimates computed with tau 0 and tau 1 values estimated with the exponential fitting program DISCRETE from voltage transients computed for these neuron models were never this large because of inherent problems in estimating closely spaced time constants from data.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
摘要
  1. 采用房室模型来计算具有逐渐变细树突或胞体分流的假设神经元以及具有胞体分流的串联重建运动神经元中电压和电流瞬变的时间常数及系数。这些时间常数和系数被用于细胞电紧张长度L的等效圆柱体公式中,以评估当将等效圆柱体公式应用于具有树突逐渐变细或胞体分流的神经元时所产生的误差大小。2. 在所有关于圆柱体(两端封闭)的公式中,最常用的公式,即我们所称的L = τ₀/τ₁(该公式使用电流钳制时间常数τ₀和τ₁),是线性逐渐变细结构中L的最稳健估计量。当圆柱体末端直径不小于初始直径的20%时,L = τ₀/τ₁对实际L的低估最多为10%。3. 圆柱体的等效圆柱体公式被应用于建模为一端具有分流胞体的圆柱体的神经元。仅基于电压钳制时间常数的L公式给出了L的精确估计。然而,对于迄今为止所研究的神经元,实验上无法可靠地获得第二个电压钳制时间常数。在其余公式中,L = τ₀/τ₁再次是L的最稳健估计量。该公式高估L的程度取决于β、ρβ = 1以及圆柱体的实际L,其中β是胞体分流因子,当β = 1(无分流)时,ρβ = 1是树突与胞体的电导比。当实际L为0.5且胞体分流较大时,该公式将L高估了两到三倍,但当实际L为1.5时,无论分流大小,高估仅为10 - 15%。4. 在建模为具有胞体分流的两个圆柱体的神经元中,当胞体分流较大时,用实际的τ₀和τ₁值计算得到的L = τ₀/τ₁值将平均L高估了两到六倍。然而,由于从数据中估计紧密间隔的时间常数存在固有问题,使用指数拟合程序DISCRETE根据这些神经元模型计算的电压瞬变估计得到的τ₀和τ₁值来计算的L = τ₀/τ₁估计值从未如此之大。(摘要截断于400字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验