Kelly D R, Murray T S
Department of Postgraduate Medicine, University of Glasgow, UK.
Med Educ. 1992 Sep;26(5):402-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1992.tb00193.x.
A retrospective analysis of the opinions of vocationally trained doctors was obtained from a postal questionnaire. Ninety-eight doctors who had trained in the West of Scotland before the introduction of new criteria in 1985 for the appointment and reappointment of training practices were compared with 107 doctors who had trained following the introduction of the criteria, looking at their rating of training, the frequency of tutorials, value of teaching and research encouragement. There was a significant improvement in the rating of training, frequency of tutorials, research encouragement and enjoyment of training in the group who trained after the new criteria were adopted. The study demonstrates the benefits of vocational training for general practice when criteria are set and followed. This training model may be applicable in other branches of medicine.
通过邮政问卷对受过职业培训的医生的意见进行了回顾性分析。将1985年新的培训实践任命和重新任命标准出台之前在苏格兰西部接受培训的98名医生与标准出台之后接受培训的107名医生进行了比较，比较内容包括他们对培训的评价、辅导课的频率、教学价值和研究鼓励情况。在采用新标准后接受培训的那组医生中，培训评价、辅导课频率、研究鼓励和培训满意度都有显著提高。该研究表明，制定并遵循标准时，全科职业培训是有益的。这种培训模式可能适用于医学的其他分支。
