• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Efficacy and tolerability of norfloxacin vs. ciprofloxacin in complicated urinary tract infection.

作者信息

Schaeffer A J, Anderson R U

机构信息

Department of Urology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Urology. 1992 Nov;40(5):446-9. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(92)90461-5.

DOI:10.1016/0090-4295(92)90461-5
PMID:1441044
Abstract

This prospective, open, randomized clinical study compared the efficacy and tolerability of norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin in adult patients with complicated urinary tract infection, defined as infection in the presence of an underlying anatomic or functional abnormality of the urinary tract. Seventy-two patients were randomized, 37 received norfloxacin (400 mg orally twice daily for 10-21 days) and 35 received ciprofloxacin (500 mg orally every 12 hours for 14-21 days). Patients were clinically assessed, and urine cultures were obtained following two to four days of therapy, and five to nine days and four to six weeks after discontinuation of therapy. Seventy-two percent of the norfloxacin group and 79 percent of the ciprofloxacin group were considered cured. This difference was not significant. One failure of norfloxacin therapy was associated with the emergence of resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Following norfloxacin therapy, in 2 patients superinfections developed with resistant organisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis [1] and Pseudomonas maltophilia [1]). Twelve patients, 6 in each group, experienced adverse reactions, which were considered related to the study drug therapy in only four instances. Our results indicated comparable efficacy and tolerability of norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection in adults.

摘要

相似文献

1
Efficacy and tolerability of norfloxacin vs. ciprofloxacin in complicated urinary tract infection.
Urology. 1992 Nov;40(5):446-9. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(92)90461-5.
2
Comparison of short-term treatment regimen of ciprofloxacin versus long-term treatment regimens of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or norfloxacin for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections: a randomized, multicentre, open-label, prospective study.环丙沙星短期治疗方案与甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑或诺氟沙星长期治疗方案用于单纯性下尿路感染的比较:一项随机、多中心、开放标签的前瞻性研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Oct;54(4):840-3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh414. Epub 2004 Sep 3.
3
Norfloxacin in the treatment of urinary tract infections in men with and without identifiable urologic complications.诺氟沙星用于治疗有无明确泌尿系统并发症的男性尿路感染。
Am J Med. 1987 Jun 26;82(6B):70-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90622-x.
4
Single-dose ciprofloxacin versus 3 days of norfloxacin in uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women.单剂量环丙沙星与3天诺氟沙星治疗女性单纯性尿路感染的比较。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002 Jan;8(1):50-4.
5
Single-dose compared with 3-day norfloxacin treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women. Canadian Infectious Diseases Society Clinical Trials Study Group.单剂量与3日诺氟沙星治疗女性单纯性尿路感染的比较。加拿大传染病协会临床试验研究组。
Arch Intern Med. 1992 Jun;152(6):1233-7.
6
Safety and efficacy of lomefloxacin versus norfloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.洛美沙星与诺氟沙星治疗复杂性尿路感染的安全性和有效性
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 May;12(5):343-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01964430.
7
Ciprofloxacin therapy in complicated urinary tract infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other resistant bacteria.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 Nov;18 Suppl D:117-21. doi: 10.1093/jac/18.supplement_d.117.
8
Efficacy and tolerance of norfloxacin in treatment of complicated urinary tract infection in outpatients with neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury.诺氟沙星治疗脊髓损伤继发神经源性膀胱门诊患者复杂性尿路感染的疗效与耐受性
Urology. 1991 Dec;38(6):589-96. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(91)80187-c.
9
In vivo activity of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, norfloxacin and pipemidic acid against Escherichia coli infections in mice.环丙沙星、氧氟沙星、诺氟沙星和吡哌酸对小鼠大肠杆菌感染的体内活性。
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1989;15(2):53-8.
10
Short-course ciprofloxacin treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women. The minimum effective dose. The Urinary Tract Infection Study Group [corrected].女性急性单纯性尿路感染的短疗程环丙沙星治疗。最小有效剂量。尿路感染研究组[校正后]
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Mar 13;155(5):485-94.

引用本文的文献

1
Intravenous or sequential ciprofloxacin therapy in hospitalised patients with a broad spectrum of infections: a post-marketing surveillance study.住院患者使用环丙沙星进行静脉或序贯治疗以应对多种感染:一项上市后监测研究
Clin Drug Investig. 2006;26(11):645-54. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200626110-00004.
2
Ciprofloxacin. An updated review of its pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability.环丙沙星。对其药理学、治疗效果及耐受性的最新综述。
Drugs. 1996 Jun;51(6):1019-74. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651060-00010.
3
Treatment of complicated urinary tract infections with lomefloxacin compared with that with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
洛美沙星与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Jun;38(6):1368-73. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.6.1368.