Mikkelsen E J, Gutheil T G, Emens M
Developmental Disabilities Research Program, Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Boston 02115.
Am J Psychother. 1992 Oct;46(4):556-70. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1992.46.4.556.
The authors review the empirical literature concerning the frequency of false allegations of sexual abuse as well as the case report literature that describes individual episodes of false allegations in detail. The authors then construct a clinical typology that is derived from the literature and their own clinical experience with similar cases. The specific subtypes of the typology are: (1) False allegation in the context of a custody dispute, (2) false allegations resulting from psychological disturbance on the part of the accuser, (3) false allegation as a conscious manipulation by the child or adolescent and, (4) false allegations based on iatrogenic factors. Clinical examples of each subtype are presented. The case material presented and reviewed indicates the importance of attending to the contextual factors surrounding the allegation and pursuing a detailed comprehensive evaluation that is as free of bias as possible.
作者回顾了关于性虐待虚假指控频率的实证文献,以及详细描述个别虚假指控事件的病例报告文献。然后,作者根据文献以及他们自己在类似案件中的临床经验构建了一种临床类型学。该类型学的具体子类型为:(1)监护权纠纷背景下的虚假指控;(2)原告心理障碍导致的虚假指控;(3)儿童或青少年有意识操纵导致的虚假指控;以及(4)基于医源性因素的虚假指控。文中给出了每种子类型的临床实例。所呈现和回顾的案例材料表明,关注指控周围的背景因素并进行尽可能无偏见的详细全面评估非常重要。