Suppr超能文献

鞘内、硬膜外及静脉注射舒芬太尼用于分娩镇痛的比较。

A comparison of intrathecal, epidural, and intravenous sufentanil for labor analgesia.

作者信息

Camann W R, Denney R A, Holby E D, Datta S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1992 Nov;77(5):884-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199211000-00008.

Abstract

A number of recent studies have suggested that the analgesic effects of highly lipid-soluble opioids are similar when these agents are administered either epidurally or intravenously. We sought to test whether the lipid-soluble opioid sufentanil was more effective when administered intrathecally than when administered epidurally or intravenously. Twenty-four women during active labor received sufentanil 10 micrograms either intrathecally (n = 9), epidurally (n = 8), or intravenously (n = 7), using a combined spinal-epidural technique. The sufentanil was administered alone, without concomitant local anesthetics. Analgesia was assessed using the visual analogue score as well as the time elapsed from the administration of study drug to the patient's request for additional analgesia via the epidural catheter (bupivacaine 0.25%). The median duration of analgesia (median, interquartile range) was 84 (70-92) min in the intrathecal group, 30 (23-32) min in the epidural group, and 34 (17-30) min in the intravenous group (P < 0.001). The intrathecal group showed rapid and significant decrease in visual analogue scale scores, whereas visual analogue scale scores in the other two groups did not decrease and remained significantly elevated compared to those of the intrathecal group at all observation points. Side effects were limited to pruritus in 3 patients (2 moderate and 1 severe) in the intrathecal group. No patient developed post-dural puncture headache. We conclude that sufentanil 10 micrograms intrathecally provides rapid and effective analgesia of 1-2-h duration during labor. Epidural and intravenous use of this dose of sufentanil did not provide evidence of satisfactory analgesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

近期的多项研究表明,高度脂溶性阿片类药物经硬膜外给药或静脉给药时,其镇痛效果相似。我们试图测试脂溶性阿片类药物舒芬太尼鞘内给药是否比硬膜外给药或静脉给药更有效。24名处于活跃期分娩的女性,采用腰麻-硬膜外联合技术,分别接受鞘内注射舒芬太尼10微克(n = 9)、硬膜外注射(n = 8)或静脉注射(n = 7)。舒芬太尼单独给药,未同时使用局部麻醉剂。使用视觉模拟评分以及从给药至患者通过硬膜外导管(0.25%布比卡因)请求追加镇痛的时间来评估镇痛效果。鞘内注射组的镇痛持续时间中位数(中位数,四分位间距)为84(70 - 92)分钟,硬膜外注射组为30(23 - 32)分钟,静脉注射组为34(17 - 30)分钟(P < 0.001)。鞘内注射组的视觉模拟量表评分迅速且显著降低,而其他两组的视觉模拟量表评分未降低,并且在所有观察点与鞘内注射组相比仍显著升高。副作用仅限于鞘内注射组的3名患者出现瘙痒(2例中度和1例重度)。无患者发生硬膜穿刺后头痛。我们得出结论,鞘内注射10微克舒芬太尼可在分娩期间提供持续1 - 2小时的快速有效镇痛。硬膜外和静脉使用该剂量的舒芬太尼未显示出令人满意的镇痛效果。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验