Suppr超能文献

三种局部麻醉剂的临床评估。

A clinical evaluation of three topical anaesthetic agents.

作者信息

Vickers E R, Punnia-Moorthy A

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sydney, Surry Hills, New South Wales.

出版信息

Aust Dent J. 1992 Aug;37(4):267-70.

PMID:1444945
Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of EMLA 5% Cream, Xylocaine 5% (lignocaine 5 per cent) and NUM (benzocaine 15 per cent, amethocaine 1.7 per cent) to a placebo in reducing the pain experience during needle insertion. In a random, double blind study three groups of twenty volunteers each had a paired topical anaesthetic/placebo placed bilaterally in the buccal sulcus of the upper premolar regions for two minutes, followed by the insertion of a standard 27 gauge needle to a depth of 5 mm. Pain experience was measured with visual analogue scales. Results showed that all three agents significantly reduced pain when compared with the placebo--EMLA (p less than 0.002); Xylocaine (p less than 0.05); NUM (p less than 0.005).

摘要

本研究比较了5%复方利多卡因乳膏、5%利多卡因和NUM(15%苯佐卡因、1.7%丁卡因)与安慰剂在减轻进针时疼痛感受方面的疗效。在一项随机双盲研究中,三组志愿者各20名,每组双侧上颌前磨牙区颊沟分别涂抹配对的局部麻醉剂/安慰剂两分钟,随后插入一根标准的27号针头至5毫米深度。疼痛感受采用视觉模拟量表进行测量。结果显示,与安慰剂相比,所有三种药物均能显著减轻疼痛——复方利多卡因乳膏(p<0.002);利多卡因(p<0.05);NUM(p<0.005)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验