Greenbaum C J, Palmer J P, Nagataki S, Yamaguchi Y, Molenaar J L, Van Beers W A, MacLaren N K, Lernmark A
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Diabetes. 1992 Dec;41(12):1570-4. doi: 10.2337/diab.41.12.1570.
The goal of the Fourth International Workshop for Standardization of ICA Measurements was to determine the specificity of ICA assays and their ability to distinguish between control sera (n = 57) and sera from IDDM-related individuals--representing relatives of IDDM patients (n = 21), healthy individuals who later developed IDDM (n = 8), or newly diagnosed IDDM patients (n = 23). Results from 28 laboratories were analyzed. The mean specificity (percentage of control sera reported as negative) among 27 laboratories was 91%, including 6 laboratories with 100% specificity. Nevertheless, 78% of laboratories found at least one control sample > 0 JDF U. Among samples from first-degree relatives, the mean concordance was 86%, including three sera found negative (0 JDF U) by all laboratories. Among individuals who later developed diabetes, the mean concordance was 93%, with two sera found positive by 100% of laboratories. In sera from newly diagnosed IDDM patients, the mean concordance was 82%. Three sera were found positive and one serum negative by all laboratories. The JDF U of the sera considered to be positive were significantly greater than each laboratory's average for the controls. In conclusion, the results from laboratories participating in the Fourth International ICA Workshop demonstrated excellent specificity, good concordance, and an ability to separate control sera from defined, IDDM-related subjects.
第四届国际胰岛细胞抗体(ICA)测量标准化研讨会的目标是确定ICA检测方法的特异性及其区分对照血清(n = 57)和1型糖尿病(IDDM)相关个体血清的能力,这些个体包括IDDM患者的亲属(n = 21)、后来患IDDM的健康个体(n = 8)或新诊断的IDDM患者(n = 23)。对28个实验室的结果进行了分析。27个实验室的平均特异性(报告为阴性的对照血清百分比)为91%,其中6个实验室的特异性为100%。然而,78%的实验室发现至少一个对照样本> 0 JDF单位。在一级亲属的样本中,平均一致性为86%,其中有三份血清被所有实验室判定为阴性(0 JDF单位)。在后来患糖尿病的个体中,平均一致性为93%,有两份血清被100%的实验室判定为阳性。在新诊断的IDDM患者的血清中,平均一致性为82%。所有实验室均发现三份血清为阳性,一份血清为阴性。被认为呈阳性的血清的JDF单位显著高于每个实验室对照血清的平均值。总之,参加第四届国际ICA研讨会的实验室结果显示出优异的特异性、良好的一致性以及将对照血清与明确的IDDM相关受试者区分开来的能力。