Calsyn D A, Spengler D M, Freeman C W
J Clin Psychol. 1977 Oct;33(4):1017-20. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197710)33:4<1017::aid-jclp2270330419>3.0.co;2-4.
The usefulness of the Somatization factor of the MMPI-168 with low back pain patients was examined in two separate studies. In study 1, 58 male veteran low back pain patients who had been divided into organic and mixed groups served as Ss. MMPI protocols were rescored for the five factors of Overall, Hunter, and Butcher (1973). The organic and mixed groups differed only on the Somatization factor. A cutting score of raw greater than or equal to 8 (T = 75) was determined to classify the sample correctly 74.5% of the time. In study 2, a second sample of 48 male veteran low back pain patients was divided into mixed, organic, and functional groups. The mixed group was subdivided further into a mixed-pain group who still were having pain and were seeking treatment and a mixed-relief group who were experiencing a reduction of pain and were returning to vocational activities. The functional and mixed-pain groups differed from the organic and mixed-relief groups on the Somatization and Depression factors. The cutting score determined in the study 1 correctly classified patients 83% of the time.
在两项独立研究中,对明尼苏达多相人格问卷-168(MMPI - 168)的躯体化因子在腰痛患者中的效用进行了检验。在研究1中,58名被分为器质性和混合型的男性退伍军人腰痛患者作为研究对象。对MMPI测验记录按照奥弗尔、亨特和布彻(1973年)提出的五个因子进行重新计分。器质性组和混合型组仅在躯体化因子上存在差异。确定原始分数大于或等于8(T = 75)的划分标准,能在74.5%的情况下正确分类样本。在研究2中,48名男性退伍军人腰痛患者的第二个样本被分为混合型、器质性和功能性组。混合型组进一步细分为仍有疼痛且寻求治疗的混合疼痛组和疼痛减轻并恢复职业活动的混合缓解组。功能性组和混合疼痛组在躯体化因子和抑郁因子上与器质性组和混合缓解组存在差异。研究1中确定的划分标准在83%的情况下能正确分类患者。