• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对长期护理机构患者讨论维持生命治疗的态度。

Attitudes toward discussing life-sustaining treatments in extended care facility patients.

作者信息

Lurie N, Pheley A M, Miles S H, Bannick-Mohrland S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55415.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Dec;40(12):1205-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb03642.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb03642.x
PMID:1447434
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine nursing home residents' attitudes toward discussing life-sustaining treatment plans with their physicians and the factors associated with these attitudes.

DESIGN

Random-sample, interviewer-administered survey.

SETTING

Forty-one nursing homes in which some residents were cared for by house-staff physicians of the Hennepin County (Minnesota) Medical Center Extended Care Department.

PATIENTS

Random sample of 150 nursing home residents receiving primary care from Extended Care Department physicians, 131 (87%) of whom completed the interview.

RESULTS

Older individuals were less likely to have spoken with physicians and family members about treatment plans (p < 0.05), and to have felt that they had more say than necessary in their treatment (P < 0.05). Only 19 (14.5%) residents had formal treatment plan discussions about limiting life-sustaining treatment. Although perceived current health status did not differ between residents with and without treatment plans, those residents who had discussions about advance directives were more likely to report health improvement over the past 6 months (P < 0.05). Residents with formal advance directives were, on average, 8.4 years younger than those without them (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Younger patients are more likely to have had discussions about life-sustaining treatment and are also more frequently involved in plan development. Preferences for level of involvement should be considered during advance directive planning, and it should be recognized that these preferences may vary with age. Future research should evaluate whether this age relationship is a true age or a cohort effect.

摘要

目的

确定疗养院居民对与医生讨论维持生命治疗计划的态度以及与这些态度相关的因素。

设计

随机抽样、由访谈员实施的调查。

地点

41所疗养院,其中一些居民由亨内平县(明尼苏达州)医疗中心延伸护理部的住院医生护理。

患者

从延伸护理部医生处接受初级护理的150名疗养院居民的随机样本,其中131人(87%)完成了访谈。

结果

年龄较大的人不太可能与医生和家庭成员讨论治疗计划(p<0.05),也不太可能觉得自己在治疗中有过多的发言权(P<0.05)。只有19名(14.5%)居民就限制维持生命治疗进行了正式的治疗计划讨论。尽管有治疗计划和没有治疗计划的居民目前感知到的健康状况没有差异,但那些讨论过预先指示的居民更有可能报告在过去6个月中健康状况有所改善(P<0.05)。有正式预先指示的居民平均比没有预先指示的居民年轻8.4岁(P<0.05)。

结论

年轻患者更有可能讨论维持生命治疗,也更频繁地参与计划制定。在预先指示规划过程中应考虑参与程度的偏好,并且应该认识到这些偏好可能因年龄而异。未来的研究应该评估这种年龄关系是真实的年龄效应还是队列效应。

相似文献

1
Attitudes toward discussing life-sustaining treatments in extended care facility patients.对长期护理机构患者讨论维持生命治疗的态度。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Dec;40(12):1205-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb03642.x.
2
Life-sustaining treatment decisions for nursing home residents: who discusses, who decides and what is decided?养老院居民维持生命治疗的决策:谁参与讨论、谁做出决定以及决定了什么?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Jan;47(1):82-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01905.x.
3
Predictors of advance directive restrictiveness and compliance with institutional policy in a long-term-care facility.长期护理机构中预先指示的限制性及对机构政策依从性的预测因素
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Jul;40(7):679-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01959.x.
4
Implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) in nursing homes in New York City.纽约市养老院中《患者自主决定法案》(PSDA)的实施情况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Jan;45(1):43-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb00976.x.
5
Changes in orders limiting care and the use of less aggressive care in a nursing home population.疗养院人群中限制医疗指令的变化以及采取不那么积极的医疗措施的情况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Mar;42(3):275-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb01751.x.
6
A prospective study of the efficacy of the physician order form for life-sustaining treatment.一份关于维持生命治疗医嘱表格有效性的前瞻性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Sep;46(9):1097-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb06647.x.
7
Long-term care facility policies on life-sustaining treatments and advance directives in Canada.加拿大长期护理机构关于维持生命治疗和预先指示的政策。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Nov;42(11):1150-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06980.x.
8
Advance directive and end-of-life care preferences among nursing home residents in Wuhan, China: a cross-sectional study.中国武汉养老院居民的预先指示和临终关怀偏好:一项横断面研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Oct;15(10):751-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
9
Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital. Attending physicians' attitudes, their inpatients' wishes, and reported experience.我们能谈谈吗?社区医院中关于预立医疗指示的住院患者讨论。主治医生的态度、住院患者的意愿及报告的经历。
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Oct 24;154(20):2299-308.
10
Life-sustaining treatments: what do physicians want and do they express their wishes to others?维持生命的治疗:医生想要什么,他们会向他人表达自己的意愿吗?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jul;51(7):961-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51309.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcomes after in-hospital CPR in older adults with chronic illness.患有慢性病的老年人院内心肺复苏后的长期预后。
Chest. 2014 Nov;146(5):1214-1225. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2110.
2
The life-sustaining treatments among cancer patients at end of life and the caregiver's experience and perspectives.终末期癌症患者的维持生命治疗以及护理人员的体验和观点。
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Feb;18(2):189-96. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0644-0. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
3
The role of proxies in treatment decisions: evaluating functional capacity to consent to end-of-life treatments within a family context.
代理人在治疗决策中的作用:在家庭背景下评估同意临终治疗的功能能力。
Behav Sci Law. 2002;20(3):235-52. doi: 10.1002/bsl.484.
4
The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients' satisfaction with primary care.关于预先医疗指示的讨论对患者初级保健满意度的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Jan;16(1):32-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00215.x.