Reilly B M, Magnussen C R, Ross J, Ash J, Papa L, Wagner M
Department of Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, NY.
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Oct 24;154(20):2299-308.
The attitudes of hospitalized patients and their attending physicians about advance directives have not been well studied. We compared these attitudes and explored relationships between them and the frequency of actual directives and directive discussions during hospitalization.
We conducted scripted interviews with 258 (94.5%) of 273 patients admitted consecutively to the acute medical service of a community teaching hospital in Rochester, NY, and contemporaneously surveyed their attending physicians (n = 68) regarding attitudes about advance directives. Primary outcome measures were patients' willingness to discuss directives, actual physician-patient directive discussions, and patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatments. Also measured were physicians' indications for directive discussions, their reasons not to discuss directives, and their knowledge and attitudes about life-sustaining treatments.
Eighty-one percent (172/212) of competent interviewed patients either did (100) or wanted to (72) discuss advance directives in hospital. Forty-one percent of patients chose to forgo cardiopulmonary resuscitation; 24% to 41% refused other life-sustaining interventions (intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, cardioversion, vasopressors). Overall, 90% (246/273) of all patients met at least one of three criteria reported by their physicians as indications for advance directive discussions: age at least 75 years, critical or potentially fatal illness, and patients' desire to discuss directives. Multiple logistic regression revealed that these same variables predicted patients' willingness to discuss cardiopulmonary resuscitation, their preferences to receive or forgo cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and the frequency of physician-patient discussions about these issues.
Most medical inpatients in a community hospital want to, are able to, and meet their own physicians' indications to discuss advance directives. Hospitalization presents an unrealized opportunity for physicians and patients to initiate these discussions.
住院患者及其主治医生对预立医疗指示的态度尚未得到充分研究。我们比较了这些态度,并探讨了它们与住院期间实际指示及指示讨论频率之间的关系。
我们对纽约州罗切斯特市一家社区教学医院急性内科连续收治的273例患者中的258例(94.5%)进行了有脚本的访谈,并同时就预立医疗指示的态度对其主治医生(n = 68)进行了调查。主要结局指标包括患者讨论指示的意愿、实际的医患指示讨论以及患者对维持生命治疗的偏好。还测量了医生进行指示讨论的指征、不讨论指示的原因以及他们对维持生命治疗的知识和态度。
81%(172/212)有行为能力的受访患者在医院里已经进行了(100例)或想要进行(72例)预立医疗指示的讨论。41%的患者选择放弃心肺复苏;24%至41%的患者拒绝其他维持生命的干预措施(入住重症监护病房、机械通气、心脏复律、血管加压药)。总体而言,所有患者中有90%(246/273)至少符合医生报告的作为预立医疗指示讨论指征的三项标准中的一项:年龄至少75岁、患有严重或潜在致命疾病以及患者想要讨论指示。多因素逻辑回归显示,这些相同变量可预测患者讨论心肺复苏的意愿、接受或放弃心肺复苏的偏好以及医患关于这些问题讨论的频率。
社区医院的大多数住院患者想要、能够并且符合其自身医生提出的讨论预立医疗指示的指征。住院为医生和患者发起这些讨论提供了一个尚未实现的机会。