• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外阴癌临床分期系统与手术分期系统的比较。

Comparison of clinical versus surgical staging systems in vulvar cancer.

作者信息

Shanbour K A, Mannel R S, Morris P C, Yadack A, Walker J L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Dec;80(6):927-30.

PMID:1448261
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare prognostic information from the new surgical staging system of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) with the old clinical staging system for vulvar cancer.

METHODS

One hundred six women with previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva who underwent radical vulvectomies and inguinal lymph node dissections at the University of Oklahoma from 1971-1990 were considered eligible for this study. A retrospective chart review was conducted to assign surgical stage. The clinical and pathologic factors analyzed for survival included the clinical and surgical stage of disease, nodal status, tumor size, and lesion location.

RESULTS

Overall 5-year survival was 64%. Forty-three patients had inguinal and femoral node metastasis with a 5-year survival of 38%, versus 87% for patients without nodal metastasis (P < .00001). An increased number of positive groin lymph nodes was associated with a poorer prognosis. Thirty-one patients had tumors of 2 cm or less in maximum diameter with no recurrences, versus 52% 5-year survival in the remaining patients (P < .001). Perineal involvement was identified in 24 patients, but did not significantly influence survival.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the new classification system revised by FIGO for vulvar cancer staging places patients into more accurate risk categories.

摘要

目的

比较国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)新的手术分期系统与旧的外阴癌临床分期系统所提供的预后信息。

方法

1971年至1990年在俄克拉荷马大学接受根治性外阴切除术和腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的106例先前未经治疗的外阴鳞状细胞癌女性被认为符合本研究条件。进行回顾性病历审查以确定手术分期。分析的与生存相关的临床和病理因素包括疾病的临床和手术分期、淋巴结状态、肿瘤大小和病变位置。

结果

总体5年生存率为64%。43例患者有腹股沟和股淋巴结转移,5年生存率为38%,而无淋巴结转移患者的5年生存率为87%(P <.00001)。腹股沟淋巴结阳性数量增加与预后较差相关。31例最大直径2 cm或更小的肿瘤患者无复发,其余患者的5年生存率为52%(P <.001)。24例患者有会阴受累,但对生存无显著影响。

结论

总体而言,FIGO修订的外阴癌分期新分类系统将患者归入更准确的风险类别。

相似文献

1
Comparison of clinical versus surgical staging systems in vulvar cancer.外阴癌临床分期系统与手术分期系统的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Dec;80(6):927-30.
2
Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Prognostic factors for local recurrence after primary en bloc radical vulvectomy and bilateral groin dissection.外阴鳞状细胞癌。根治性整块外阴切除术及双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后局部复发的预后因素。
J Reprod Med. 2000 Aug;45(8):672-8.
3
Impact of the new FIGO 2009 staging classification for vulvar cancer on prognosis and stage distribution.FIGO 2009 外阴癌分期分类对预后和分期分布的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Oct;127(1):147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
4
Staging and recurrence of disease in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.外阴鳞状细胞癌的疾病分期与复发
Gynecol Oncol. 1995 Oct;59(1):34-7. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1264.
5
Treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma: a comparison of the 1997 and 1977 American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems.上颌窦癌的治疗:1997年与1977年美国癌症联合委员会分期系统的比较
Cancer. 1999 Nov 1;86(9):1700-11.
6
Inguinal sentinel node dissection versus standard inguinal node dissection in patients with vulvar cancer: A comparison of the size of metastasis detected in inguinal lymph nodes.外阴癌患者腹股沟前哨淋巴结清扫术与标准腹股沟淋巴结清扫术:腹股沟淋巴结转移灶大小的比较
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Apr;101(1):24-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.08.052. Epub 2005 Oct 24.
7
[Results of an individualized surgical therapy of vulvar carcinoma from 1973-1993].[1973年至1993年外阴癌个体化手术治疗的结果]
Zentralbl Gynakol. 1997;119 Suppl 1:8-16.
8
[Effectiveness of radical therapy in vulvar carcinoma. An analysis of 148 cases].[外阴癌根治性治疗的有效性。148例分析]
Zentralbl Gynakol. 1997;119(4):166-72.
9
[A comparison of clinical and surgical-pathologic staging of advanced vulvar cancer].[晚期外阴癌临床分期与手术病理分期的比较]
Przegl Lek. 1999;56(1):94-9.
10
T2/3 vulva cancer: a case-control study of triple incision versus en bloc radical vulvectomy and inguinal lymphadenectomy.T2/3期外阴癌:三切口与整块根治性外阴切除术及腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的病例对照研究
Gynecol Oncol. 1995 Jun;57(3):335-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1152.

引用本文的文献

1
FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva: 2021 revision.外阴癌的国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期:2021年修订版。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Oct;155(1):43-47. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13880.