Elia Marinos, Stratton Rebecca, Stubbs James
Institute of Human Nutrition, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Proc Nutr Soc. 2003 May;62(2):529-37. doi: 10.1079/pns2003255.
Energy balance can be estimated in tissues, body segments, individual subjects (the focus of the present article), groups of subjects and even societies. Changes in body composition in individual subjects can be translated into changes in the energy content of the body, but this method is limited by the precision of the techniques. The precision for measuring fat and fat-free mass can be as low as 0.5 kg when certain reference techniques are used (hydrodensitometry, air-displacement plethysmography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), and approximately 0.7 kg for changes between two time points. Techniques associated with a measurement error of 0.7 kg for changes in fat and fat-free mass (approximately 18 MJ) are of little or no value for calculating energy balance over short periods of time, but they may be of some value over long periods of time (18 MJ over 1 year corresponds to an average daily energy balance of 70 kJ, which is < 1% of the normal dietary energy intake). Body composition measurements can also be useful in calculating changes in energy balance when the changes in body weight and composition are large, e.g. > 5-10 kg. The same principles can be applied to the assessment of energy balance in body segments using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Energy balance can be obtained over periods as short as a few minutes, e.g. during measurements of BMR. The variability in BMR between individuals of similar age, weight and height and gender is about 7-9%, most of which is of biological origin rather than measurement error, which is about 2%. Measurement of total energy expenditure during starvation (no energy intake) can also be used to estimate energy balance in a whole-body calorimeter, in patients in intensive care units being artificially ventilated and by tracer techniques. The precision of these techniques varies from 1 to 10%. Establishing energy balance by measuring the discrepancy between energy intake and expenditure has to take into consideration the combined validity and reliability of both components. The measurement error for dietary intake may be as low as 2-3% in carefully controlled environments, in which subjects are provided only with certain food items and bomb calorimetry can be undertaken on duplicate samples of the diet. Reliable results can also be obtained in hospitalised patients receiving enteral tube feeding or parenteral nutrition as the only source of nutrition. Unreliability increases to an unknown extent in free-living subjects eating a mixed and varied diet; thus, improved methodology is needed for the study of energy balance.
能量平衡可在组织、身体节段、个体受试者(本文重点)、受试者群体乃至社会层面进行评估。个体受试者身体成分的变化可转化为身体能量含量的变化,但这种方法受技术精度的限制。当使用某些参考技术(水下密度测定法、空气置换体积描记法、双能X线吸收法)时,测量脂肪和去脂体重的精度可低至0.5千克,两个时间点之间变化的测量精度约为0.7千克。对于脂肪和去脂体重变化测量误差为0.7千克(约18兆焦耳)的技术,在短时间内计算能量平衡时价值不大或毫无价值,但在长时间内可能有一定价值(1年内18兆焦耳相当于平均每日能量平衡70千焦耳,占正常饮食能量摄入量的比例不到1%)。当体重和身体成分变化较大,如超过5 - 10千克时,身体成分测量在计算能量平衡变化方面也可能有用。同样的原理可应用于使用双能X线吸收法评估身体节段的能量平衡。能量平衡可在短短几分钟内获得,例如在基础代谢率测量期间。年龄、体重、身高和性别相似的个体之间基础代谢率的变异性约为7 - 9%,其中大部分是生物学来源而非测量误差,测量误差约为2%。在饥饿状态下(无能量摄入)总能量消耗的测量也可用于在全身热量计中、在接受人工通气的重症监护病房患者中以及通过示踪技术来估计能量平衡。这些技术的精度在1%至10%之间变化。通过测量能量摄入与消耗之间的差异来确定能量平衡,必须考虑这两个组成部分的综合有效性和可靠性。在精心控制的环境中,受试者仅被提供特定食物且可对饮食的重复样本进行弹式热量测定时,饮食摄入量的测量误差可能低至2 - 3%。在接受肠内管饲或肠外营养作为唯一营养来源的住院患者中也可获得可靠结果。在自由生活且饮食混合多样的受试者中,不可靠性会增加到未知程度;因此,研究能量平衡需要改进方法。