Craggs R J, Davies-Colley R J, Tanner C C, Sukias J P
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd (NIWA), P. O. Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Water Sci Technol. 2003;48(2):259-67.
Many domestic Wastewater Stabilisation Ponds (WSPs) or oxidation ponds in New Zealand require upgrading to reduce pollution of receiving waters. Advanced Pond Systems (APS) consisting of an Advanced Facultative Pond, High Rate Pond, Algae Settling Pond and Maturation Pond may provide a cost effective upgrade option. This paper presents the results of a 2-year study of the performance of two pilot APS systems with High Rate Ponds of different depths and areas. The HRPs of the APS systems both had the same flow rate (5 m3 d(-1)), volume (37.5 m3) and thus hydraulic retention time (7.5 d). However, the East HRP had an operating depth of 0.30 m and a surface area of 128 m2, and the West HRP had an operating depth of 0.45 m and a surface area of 85 m2. APS system performance was compared in terms of improvement of water quality. For nearly all parameters measured, there was little difference in performance between the two systems suggesting that the system with the smaller area could be used without affecting treatment. Comparison of final effluent with typical effluent of New Zealand WSPs showed that APS effluent was of higher quality and much less variable over time.
新西兰的许多生活污水稳定塘(WSPs)或氧化塘需要升级,以减少对受纳水体的污染。由高级兼性塘、高速率塘、藻类沉降塘和熟化塘组成的高级塘系统(APS)可能提供一种经济高效的升级方案。本文介绍了对两个具有不同深度和面积的高速率塘的试点APS系统进行的为期两年的性能研究结果。APS系统的高速率塘(HRPs)流量均相同(5立方米/天)、体积相同(37.5立方米),因此水力停留时间相同(7.5天)。然而,东部高速率塘的运行深度为0.30米,表面积为128平方米,西部高速率塘的运行深度为0.45米,表面积为85平方米。从水质改善方面对APS系统性能进行了比较。对于几乎所有测量参数,两个系统的性能差异不大,这表明面积较小的系统在不影响处理效果的情况下也可使用。将最终出水与新西兰生活污水稳定塘的典型出水进行比较表明,APS出水水质更高,且随时间变化的波动更小。