Passam F, Hoing S, Prinianakis G, Siafakas N, Milic-Emili J, Georgopoulos D
Pulmonary Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Respiration. 2003 Jul-Aug;70(4):355-61. doi: 10.1159/000072897.
Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) has been shown to maintain better patient-ventilator synchrony than pressure support ventilation (PSV); however, its clinical advantage regarding invasive ventilation of COPD patients has not been clarified.
To compare the effect of PAV and PSV on respiratory parameters of hypercapnic COPD patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF).
Nine intubated hypercapnic COPD patients were placed on the PAV or PSV mode in random sequence. For each mode, four levels (L1-L4) of support were applied. At each level, blood gases, flow, tidal volume (VT), airway pressure (Paw), esophageal pressure (Pes) (n = 7), patient respiratory rate (fp), ventilator rate (fv), missing efforts (ME = fp - fv) were measured.
We found increases in ME with increasing levels of PSV but not with PAV. PO2 and VT increased whereas PCO2 decreased significantly with increasing levels of PSV (p < 0.05). With PAV, PCO2 decreased and VT increased significantly only at L4 whereas PO2 increased from L1 to L4. Runaways were observed at L3 and L4 of PAV. The pressure-time product (PTP) was determined for effective and missing breaths. The mean total PTP per minute (of effective plus missing breaths) was 160 +/- 57 cm H2O/s.min in PSV and 194 +/- 60 cm H2O/s.min in PAV.
We conclude that in COPD patients with hypercapnic ARF, with increasing support, PSV causes the appearance of ME whereas PAV develops runaway phenomena, due to the different patient-ventilator interaction; however, these do not limit the improvement of blood gases with the application of both methods.
比例辅助通气(PAV)已被证明比压力支持通气(PSV)能更好地维持患者与呼吸机的同步性;然而,其在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者有创通气方面的临床优势尚未明确。
比较PAV和PSV对伴有急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)的高碳酸血症COPD患者呼吸参数的影响。
9例插管的高碳酸血症COPD患者随机依次接受PAV或PSV模式通气。对于每种模式,应用四个支持水平(L1 - L4)。在每个水平,测量血气、流量、潮气量(VT)、气道压力(Paw)、食管压力(Pes)(n = 7)、患者呼吸频率(fp)、呼吸机频率(fv)、无效触发(ME = fp - fv)。
我们发现随着PSV水平的增加ME增加,而PAV则不然。随着PSV水平的增加,PO2和VT增加,而PCO2显著降低(p < 0.05)。使用PAV时,仅在L4时PCO2降低且VT显著增加,而PO2从L1到L4增加。在PAV的L3和L4观察到失控现象。测定有效呼吸和无效呼吸的压力 - 时间乘积(PTP)。PSV每分钟有效呼吸加无效呼吸的平均总PTP为160±57 cm H2O/s·min,PAV为194±60 cm H2O/s·min。
我们得出结论,在伴有高碳酸血症ARF的COPD患者中,随着支持水平的增加,由于患者与呼吸机的相互作用不同,PSV会导致ME出现,而PAV会出现失控现象;然而,这些并不限制两种方法应用时血气的改善。