Suppr超能文献

不同水平压力支持和比例辅助通气对机械通气的高碳酸血症型慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性呼吸衰竭患者呼吸模式、呼吸功及气体交换的影响

Effect of different levels of pressure support and proportional assist ventilation on breathing pattern, work of breathing and gas exchange in mechanically ventilated hypercapnic COPD patients with acute respiratory failure.

作者信息

Passam F, Hoing S, Prinianakis G, Siafakas N, Milic-Emili J, Georgopoulos D

机构信息

Pulmonary Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

出版信息

Respiration. 2003 Jul-Aug;70(4):355-61. doi: 10.1159/000072897.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) has been shown to maintain better patient-ventilator synchrony than pressure support ventilation (PSV); however, its clinical advantage regarding invasive ventilation of COPD patients has not been clarified.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of PAV and PSV on respiratory parameters of hypercapnic COPD patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF).

METHODS

Nine intubated hypercapnic COPD patients were placed on the PAV or PSV mode in random sequence. For each mode, four levels (L1-L4) of support were applied. At each level, blood gases, flow, tidal volume (VT), airway pressure (Paw), esophageal pressure (Pes) (n = 7), patient respiratory rate (fp), ventilator rate (fv), missing efforts (ME = fp - fv) were measured.

RESULTS

We found increases in ME with increasing levels of PSV but not with PAV. PO2 and VT increased whereas PCO2 decreased significantly with increasing levels of PSV (p < 0.05). With PAV, PCO2 decreased and VT increased significantly only at L4 whereas PO2 increased from L1 to L4. Runaways were observed at L3 and L4 of PAV. The pressure-time product (PTP) was determined for effective and missing breaths. The mean total PTP per minute (of effective plus missing breaths) was 160 +/- 57 cm H2O/s.min in PSV and 194 +/- 60 cm H2O/s.min in PAV.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that in COPD patients with hypercapnic ARF, with increasing support, PSV causes the appearance of ME whereas PAV develops runaway phenomena, due to the different patient-ventilator interaction; however, these do not limit the improvement of blood gases with the application of both methods.

摘要

背景

比例辅助通气(PAV)已被证明比压力支持通气(PSV)能更好地维持患者与呼吸机的同步性;然而,其在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者有创通气方面的临床优势尚未明确。

目的

比较PAV和PSV对伴有急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)的高碳酸血症COPD患者呼吸参数的影响。

方法

9例插管的高碳酸血症COPD患者随机依次接受PAV或PSV模式通气。对于每种模式,应用四个支持水平(L1 - L4)。在每个水平,测量血气、流量、潮气量(VT)、气道压力(Paw)、食管压力(Pes)(n = 7)、患者呼吸频率(fp)、呼吸机频率(fv)、无效触发(ME = fp - fv)。

结果

我们发现随着PSV水平的增加ME增加,而PAV则不然。随着PSV水平的增加,PO2和VT增加,而PCO2显著降低(p < 0.05)。使用PAV时,仅在L4时PCO2降低且VT显著增加,而PO2从L1到L4增加。在PAV的L3和L4观察到失控现象。测定有效呼吸和无效呼吸的压力 - 时间乘积(PTP)。PSV每分钟有效呼吸加无效呼吸的平均总PTP为160±57 cm H2O/s·min,PAV为194±60 cm H2O/s·min。

结论

我们得出结论,在伴有高碳酸血症ARF的COPD患者中,随着支持水平的增加,由于患者与呼吸机的相互作用不同,PSV会导致ME出现,而PAV会出现失控现象;然而,这些并不限制两种方法应用时血气的改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验