• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术患者的生存情况:带ePTFE覆膜支架与裸支架的比较。

Survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: ePTFE-covered stentgrafts versus bare stents.

作者信息

Angermayr Bernhard, Cejna Manfred, Koenig Franz, Karnel Franz, Hackl Franz, Gangl Alfred, Peck-Radosavljevic Markus

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Vienna Medical School, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2003 Oct;38(4):1043-50. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50423.

DOI:10.1053/jhep.2003.50423
PMID:14512892
Abstract

In patients with liver cirrhosis, implantation of a transjugular intrahepatic shunt (TIPS) leads to reduction of portal pressure, but not of mortality compared with other therapies. The high stenosis rates of conventional bare stents causes high reintervention rates and costs and may be correlated with poor survival. ePTFE-covered stentgrafts provide much improved patency rates, but their impact on survival is unclear. All suitable patients receiving either bare TIPS (419/466) or undergoing implantation of ePTFE endoprostheses (89/100) in several centers in Austria up to 2002 were included in this retrospective analysis. Both patient groups were compared regarding survival with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. Unmatched and 1:1-matched survival analyses were performed. Patients undergoing ePTFE stentgraft implantation had significantly higher survival rates in all analyses. The 3-month, 1-year, and 2-year survival rates were 93%, 88%, and 76% for the ePTFE-group and 83%, 73%, and 62% for conventional TIPS patients, respectively. The matched survival analyses validated these findings. The model of the stent, patient age, and Child-Pugh Class (CPC) were independent predictors of survival. In conclusion, patients undergoing ePTFE-endoprosthesis implantation had higher survival rates within 2 years after TIPS-implantation. This may be the result of improved patency rates after correct placement (up to the inferior caval vein [ICV]) of the ePTFE stentgraft. These data should be validated in a prospective series.

摘要

在肝硬化患者中,经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)可降低门静脉压力,但与其他治疗方法相比,并未降低死亡率。传统裸支架的高狭窄率导致高再干预率和成本,且可能与生存率低相关。聚四氟乙烯(ePTFE)覆膜支架移植物的通畅率有显著提高,但其对生存率的影响尚不清楚。截至2002年,奥地利多个中心所有接受裸TIPS(419/466)或植入ePTFE内支架(89/100)的合适患者均纳入本回顾性分析。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox回归分析比较两组患者的生存率。进行了非配对和1:1配对生存分析。在所有分析中,接受ePTFE支架移植物植入的患者生存率显著更高。ePTFE组的3个月、1年和2年生存率分别为93%、88%和76%,传统TIPS患者分别为83%、73%和62%。配对生存分析验证了这些结果。支架型号、患者年龄和Child-Pugh分级(CPC)是生存的独立预测因素。总之,TIPS植入术后2年内,接受ePTFE内支架植入的患者生存率更高。这可能是ePTFE支架移植物正确放置(直至下腔静脉[ICV])后通畅率提高的结果。这些数据应在前瞻性研究中得到验证。

相似文献

1
Survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: ePTFE-covered stentgrafts versus bare stents.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术患者的生存情况:带ePTFE覆膜支架与裸支架的比较。
Hepatology. 2003 Oct;38(4):1043-50. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50423.
2
Comparison of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt dysfunction in PTFE-covered stent-grafts versus bare stents.聚四氟乙烯覆膜支架移植物与裸支架治疗经颈静脉肝内门体分流术功能障碍的比较
Eur J Radiol. 2005 Jul;55(1):120-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.10.007.
3
ePTFE-covered stent-grafts for revision of obstructed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.用于修复阻塞性经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的聚四氟乙烯覆膜支架移植物。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002 Sep-Oct;25(5):365-72. doi: 10.1007/s00270-001-0121-8. Epub 2002 Mar 23.
4
Comparison study of Doppler ultrasound surveillance of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent versus bare stent in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术中膨体聚四氟乙烯覆膜支架与裸支架的多普勒超声监测对比研究
J Clin Ultrasound. 2010 Sep;38(7):353-60. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20709.
5
Covered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stents maintain lower portal pressure and require fewer reinterventions than uncovered stents.覆膜经颈静脉肝内门体分流术支架比未覆膜支架能维持更低的门静脉压力,且需要更少的再次干预。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004 Oct;39(10):994-9. doi: 10.1080/00365520410003443.
6
[The impact of secondary insertion of ePTFE-coated stent on sustainable TIPS patency].[ePTFE涂层支架二次植入对经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)长期通畅性的影响]
Vnitr Lek. 2007 Feb;53(2):123-8.
7
PTFE-covered stents improve TIPS patency in Budd-Chiari syndrome.聚四氟乙烯覆膜支架可提高布加综合征经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的通畅率。
Hepatology. 2004 Nov;40(5):1197-202. doi: 10.1002/hep.20436.
8
Long-term outcome of a covered vs. uncovered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in Budd-Chiari syndrome.布加综合征中覆膜与非覆膜经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的长期预后
Liver Int. 2008 Feb;28(2):249-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01649.x.
9
Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered stents versus bare stents for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in people with liver cirrhosis.聚四氟乙烯覆膜支架与裸支架经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗肝硬化的效果比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 2;8(8):CD012358. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012358.pub2.
10
Differences in long-term survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for refractory ascites and variceal bleed.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗顽固性腹水和静脉曲张出血后的长期生存率差异。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Mar;20(3):474-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03601.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of controlled-expansion transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (CX-TIPS) in an interdisciplinary setting at a large tertiary center.在一家大型三级医疗中心的多学科环境中,可控扩张经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(CX-TIPS)的有效性。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s00508-025-02606-7.
2
The unwell patient with advanced chronic liver disease: when to use each score?患有晚期慢性肝病的不适患者:何时使用每种评分?
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 9;23(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04185-w.
3
Drainage of ascites in cirrhosis.肝硬化腹水的引流
World J Hepatol. 2024 Sep 27;16(9):1245-1257. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i9.1245.
4
Prognosis after splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for esophagogastric variceal bleeding.脾切除加心包去血管化联合经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血后的预后
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Aug 27;15(8):1641-1651. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1641.
5
Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt With or Without Gastroesophageal Variceal Embolization for the Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术联合或不联合胃食管静脉曲张栓塞术预防静脉曲张再出血:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Gastroenterology Res. 2023 Apr;16(2):68-78. doi: 10.14740/gr1618. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
6
Retrospective evaluation of early thrombosis in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic polytetrafluoroethylene-coated shunts under 2-day postinterventional heparinization.经皮经肝门静脉-腔静脉聚四氟乙烯涂层分流术术后 2 天内肝素化后早期血栓的回顾性评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 22;12(1):10506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14388-3.
7
Percutaneous creation of direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunts - an alternative for failed TIPS creation.经皮直接肝内门体分流术的创建——TIPS创建失败后的一种替代方法。
CVIR Endovasc. 2022 Mar 12;5(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s42155-022-00292-4.
8
Predicting death or recurrence of portal hypertension symptoms after TIPS procedures.预测经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后门静脉高压症状的死亡或复发情况。
Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):3346-3357. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08437-0. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
9
External Validation of the FIPS Score for Post-TIPS Mortality in a National Veterans Affairs Cohort.FIPS 评分对全国退伍军人事务队列中 TIPS 术后死亡率的外部验证。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Sep;67(9):4581-4589. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07307-5. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
10
Step by Step: Managing the Complications of Cirrhosis.循序渐进:肝硬化并发症的管理
Hepat Med. 2021 May 25;13:45-57. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S278032. eCollection 2021.