Vida Judith E
Institute of Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Anal Psychol. 2003 Sep;48(4):491-7. doi: 10.1111/1465-5922.00411.
I want to explore the notion of 'mutual introjection, the developmental essence of an autobiographical dialogue', an idea that has recently crystallized in the continuing collaborative work of Gershon J. Molad of Israel and myself concerning the autobiographical contribution to the dialogue between analysis (Molad & Vida 2002). One of the sources of this crystallization is the experience of my consultative relationship with a Jungian colleague, who, after reading some of this collaborative work, paraphrased Jung's implication that if, in the course of treatment, the doctor is not as transformed as the patient, nothing has happened (1946). In this paper, I want to breathe some life into these theoretical-sounding words: 'mutual introjection, the developmental essence of an autobiographical dialogue'.
我想要探讨“相互内摄，即自传性对话的发展本质”这一概念，这一想法最近在以色列的格申·J·莫拉德和我持续的合作研究中逐渐成形，该研究围绕分析过程中自传性内容对对话的贡献展开（莫拉德和维达，2002）。这一概念形成的其中一个源头，是我与一位荣格派同事的咨询关系体验。他在阅读了部分这项合作研究后，阐释了荣格的观点，即如果在治疗过程中，医生没有像患者那样发生转变，那就等于什么都没发生（1946）。在本文中，我想给这些听起来很理论化的表述“相互内摄，即自传性对话的发展本质”注入一些活力。
