Bossuyt Patrick M, Reitsma Johannes B, Bruns David E, Gatsonis Constantine A, Glasziou Paul P, Irwig Les M, Moher David, Rennie Drummond, de Vet Henrica C W, Lijmer Jeroen G
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center--University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Croat Med J. 2003 Oct;44(5):639-50.
The quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. Complete and accurate reporting is necessary to enable readers to assess the potential for bias in a study and to evaluate the generalisability of the results. A group of scientists and editors has developed the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) statement to improve the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The statement consists of a checklist of 25 items and flow diagram that authors can use to ensure that all relevant information is present. This explanatory document aims to facilitate the use, understanding and dissemination of the checklist. The document contains a clarification of the meaning, rationale and optimal use of each item on the checklist, as well as a short summary of the available evidence on bias and applicability. The STARD statement, checklist, flowchart, and this explanation and elaboration document should be useful resources to improve the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Complete and informative reporting can only lead to better decisions in health care.
诊断准确性研究的报告质量不尽如人意。完整且准确的报告对于使读者能够评估研究中存在偏差的可能性以及评估结果的可推广性而言是必要的。一组科学家和编辑制定了STARD(诊断准确性研究报告标准)声明,以提高诊断准确性研究的报告质量。该声明由一份包含25项内容的清单和一个流程图组成,作者可借此确保所有相关信息都已涵盖。这份解释性文件旨在促进该清单的使用、理解和传播。该文件对清单上每个条目的含义、基本原理和最佳用法进行了阐释,还简要总结了有关偏差和适用性的现有证据。STARD声明、清单、流程图以及这份解释与阐述文件应是提高诊断准确性研究报告质量的有用资源。完整且信息丰富的报告只会带来医疗保健方面更好的决策。