Brusini Paolo, Tosoni Claudia
Department of Ophthalmology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy.
J Glaucoma. 2003 Oct;12(5):417-26. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200310000-00004.
To evaluate three new approaches for staging severity of glaucomatous visual field defects using frequency doubling technology.
One hundred and four patients with either ocular hypertension or chronic glaucoma were tested with both standard automated perimetry (SAP, 30-2 Humphrey threshold test) and frequency doubling technology (N-30 threshold test). Standard automated perimetry results were classified into four groups (normal tests, early defects, moderate defects, and severe defects) using the Glaucoma Staging System. Frequency doubling technology tests were also classified in four groups using three different approaches: frequency doubling technology probability map analysis, considering the number and location of disturbed points, frequency doubling technology MD and PSD indices, graphed on a two-axis diagram (FDT Staging System), and an abnormality score, based on both the statistical significance and the spatial location of depressed points. A control group of 20 eyes from 20 normal subjects was also tested and classified in the same way. The Cohen Kappa was used to compare the level of agreement between the three frequency doubling technology methods of classification and the glaucoma staging system.
Measure of agreement was 0.679 using probability map assessment, 0.793 using the frequency doubling technology staging system, and 0.663 using the abnormality score. The specificity rate was 95% for all three methods.
All the studied approaches were able to correctly stage the glaucomatous functional damage, but the frequency doubling technology staging system was the easiest and quickest method. Moreover, it is the only method that supplies information on the characteristics of the defect, without requiring any other time-consuming procedures.
使用频率加倍技术评估三种用于青光眼视野缺损严重程度分期的新方法。
对104例高眼压症或慢性青光眼患者进行标准自动视野计检查(SAP,30 - 2 Humphrey阈值测试)和频率加倍技术检查(N - 30阈值测试)。使用青光眼分期系统将标准自动视野计检查结果分为四组(正常检查、早期缺损、中度缺损和重度缺损)。频率加倍技术检查结果也使用三种不同方法分为四组:频率加倍技术概率图分析,考虑受干扰点的数量和位置;频率加倍技术平均偏差(MD)和模式标准差(PSD)指数,绘制在二维图上(FDT分期系统);以及基于压低点数的统计显著性和空间位置的异常评分。还对20名正常受试者的20只眼睛组成的对照组进行了相同方式的测试和分类。使用Cohen Kappa系数比较三种频率加倍技术分类方法与青光眼分期系统之间的一致性水平。
使用概率图评估的一致性测量值为0.679,使用频率加倍技术分期系统的为0.793,使用异常评分的为0.663。所有三种方法的特异度均为95%。
所有研究方法都能够正确地对青光眼功能损害进行分期,但频率加倍技术分期系统是最简单、最快捷的方法。此外,它是唯一一种无需任何其他耗时程序即可提供缺损特征信息的方法。