• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

城市急诊科的患者及访客对临床研究的看法。

How patients and visitors to an urban emergency department view clinical research.

作者信息

Wilets Ilene, O'Rourke Maria, Nassisi Denise

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Oct;10(10):1081-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00578.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00578.x
PMID:14525741
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess views about clinical research, drawing current opinion from an urban, largely minority population within the authors' emergency department (ED).

METHODS

Two focus groups of ED patients and visitors were conducted. These data informed the development of a 27-item interview examining views about clinical research and knowledge of human subjects protections.

RESULTS

The authors interviewed a total of 172 patients and visitors within an adult ED. Study participants reflected the diverse patient population: 38% were African American, 32% Hispanic, 25% white, and 6% other. When asked why one might choose to participate in medical research, 46% said to benefit mankind, 26% said to improve one's own health, 18% cited access to medical care, 17% said financial incentive, and 11% said curiosity. When asked why one might decline research participation, 38% cited fear, 24% cited lack of interest in research, 10% cited medical mistrust, 9% indicated not wanting to feel like a "guinea pig," 6% indicated lack of time, and 5% suggested privacy concerns. When asked about the meaning of informed consent, 32% did not know. Many respondents (26%) were unaware that they could withdraw from a study. Although the majority (96%) endorsed a statement about the potential benefit of research for themselves or their loved ones, a sizable proportion of respondents (49%) equated research subjects to "human guinea pigs."

CONCLUSIONS

Although many individuals tend to view clinical research favorably, a level of medical mistrust exists. The concerns about human experimentation and the limited understanding of human subject protections underscore the need to improve informed consent.

摘要

目的

从作者所在急诊科的城市人口(主要为少数族裔)中收集当前意见,以评估对临床研究的看法。

方法

对急诊科患者及访客进行了两个焦点小组访谈。这些数据为一项27项访谈的开展提供了信息,该访谈旨在考察对临床研究的看法及对人体受试者保护的了解。

结果

作者在一家成人急诊科共访谈了172名患者及访客。研究参与者反映了患者群体的多样性:38%为非裔美国人,32%为西班牙裔,25%为白人,6%为其他族裔。当被问及为何可能选择参与医学研究时,46%的人表示是为了造福人类,26%的人表示是为了改善自身健康,18%的人提到可获得医疗服务,17%的人说是经济激励,11%的人说是出于好奇。当被问及为何可能拒绝参与研究时,38%的人表示害怕,24%的人表示对研究缺乏兴趣,10%的人表示对医疗不信任,9%的人表示不想感觉像“小白鼠”,6%的人表示没时间,5%的人提到隐私问题。当被问及知情同意的含义时,32%的人不知道。许多受访者(26%)不知道自己可以退出研究。尽管大多数人(96%)认可关于研究对自己或亲人可能有益的陈述,但相当一部分受访者(49%)将研究受试者等同于“人体小白鼠”。

结论

尽管许多人倾向于对临床研究持积极看法,但仍存在一定程度的医疗不信任。对人体实验的担忧以及对人体受试者保护的有限理解凸显了改进知情同意的必要性。

相似文献

1
How patients and visitors to an urban emergency department view clinical research.城市急诊科的患者及访客对临床研究的看法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Oct;10(10):1081-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00578.x.
2
An approach to community consultation prior to initiating an emergency research study incorporating a waiver of informed consent.在启动一项包含放弃知情同意的紧急研究之前进行社区咨询的方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Dec;6(12):1210-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00135.x.
3
Attitudes of emergency department patients and visitors regarding emergency exception from informed consent in resuscitation research, community consultation, and public notification.急诊科患者及访客对于复苏研究、社区咨询和公众通知中知情同意紧急例外情况的态度。
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;10(4):352-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01348.x.
4
Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases.澳大利亚成年人对保护其健康信息在统计数据库中隐私的看法。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Apr;81(4):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
5
Public attitudes regarding willingness to participate in medical research studies.公众对参与医学研究的意愿所持的态度。
J Health Soc Policy. 2000;12(2):23-43. doi: 10.1300/J045v12n02_02.
6
Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK.英国患者及公众对知情同意模式和电子健康记录知晓程度的态度。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Apr;84(4):237-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
7
Patient acceptance of rapid HIV testing practices in an urban emergency department: assessment of the 2006 CDC recommendations for HIV screening in health care settings.城市急诊科患者对快速艾滋病毒检测方法的接受度:对2006年美国疾病控制与预防中心关于医疗环境中艾滋病毒筛查建议的评估
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Mar;51(3):303-9, 309.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.10.028. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
8
Community consultation in emergency research.急诊研究中的社区咨询
Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug;34(8):2049-52. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000227649.72651.F1.
9
Does informed consent given by healthy individuals when enrolling in clinical research feel less voluntary than for ill individuals?健康个体在参加临床研究时签署知情同意书是否比患病个体感到不那么自愿?
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Aug;103:33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
10
How do prudent laypeople define an emergency medical condition?谨慎的外行人如何定义紧急医疗状况?
J Emerg Med. 1999 May-Jun;17(3):413-8. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(99)00014-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Variations in racial and ethnic groups' trust in researchers associated with willingness to participate in research.不同种族和族裔群体对研究人员的信任度差异与参与研究的意愿相关。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01960-z. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
The Inclusion of Underrepresented Populations in Cardiovascular Genetics and Epidemiology.心血管遗传学和流行病学中代表性不足人群的纳入。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Feb 5;11(2):56. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11020056.
3
Optimizing Recruitment and Retention in Substance Use Disorder Research in Emergency Departments.
优化急诊科物质使用障碍研究中的招募和保留。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 20;24(2):228-235. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.11.57179.
4
Exploring the Motivational Drivers of Young Adults with Diabetes for Participation in Kidney Research.探索糖尿病青年成人参与肾脏研究的动机驱动因素。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Nov 13;9:23743735221138236. doi: 10.1177/23743735221138236. eCollection 2022.
5
Measuring patient experience in the emergency department: A scoping review.急诊科患者体验的测量:一项范围综述。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;10(4):249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
Inclusion of special populations in clinical research: important considerations and guidelines.临床研究中特殊人群的纳入:重要考量与指南
J Clin Transl Res. 2018 Apr 7;4(1):56-69. eCollection 2018 May 28.
7
Post-GWAS in Psychiatric Genetics: A Developmental Perspective on the "Other" Next Steps.精神病遗传学中的全基因组关联研究后分析:关于“其他”后续步骤的发展视角
Genes Brain Behav. 2018 Mar;17(3):e12447. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12447. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
8
Accessing health services through the back door: a qualitative interview study investigating reasons why people participate in health research in Canada.走后门获取医疗服务:一项定性访谈研究,旨在调查加拿大民众参与健康研究的原因。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Oct 12;14:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-40.
9
Recruitment and retention strategies for minority or poor clinical research participants: lessons from the Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span study.招募和保留少数民族或贫困临床研究参与者的策略:多样性跨越生命研究的邻里健康老龄化研究的经验教训。
Gerontologist. 2011 Jun;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S33-45. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr027.
10
Informed consent for clinical trials in acute coronary syndromes and stroke following the European Clinical Trials Directive: investigators' experiences and attitudes.遵循欧洲临床试验指令获取急性冠状动脉综合征和中风临床试验的知情同意:研究者的经验与态度
Trials. 2008 Jul 21;9:45. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-45.