• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索糖尿病青年成人参与肾脏研究的动机驱动因素。

Exploring the Motivational Drivers of Young Adults with Diabetes for Participation in Kidney Research.

作者信息

Mohini P, Palaganas M, Elia Y, Motran L, Sochett E, Curtis J, Scholey J W, McArthur L, Mahmud F H

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2022 Nov 13;9:23743735221138236. doi: 10.1177/23743735221138236. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1177/23743735221138236
PMID:36388087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9663656/
Abstract

Understanding motivational drivers and barriers to patient participation in diabetes research are important to ensure research is relevant and valuable. Young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) completed a 31-question qualitative survey evaluating participant experience, understanding, and motivators and barriers to research involvement. A total of 35 participants, 19-28 years of age, 60% female, completed the survey. Motivating factors included personal benefit, relationship with the study team, curiosity, financial compensation, altruism, and nostalgia. Older participants (>22 years) reported higher levels of trust in the study team (p = 0.02) and their relationship with the study team positively influenced their decision to participate (p = 0.03). Financial compensation was a strong motivator for participants with higher education (p = 0.02). Age, sex, education level, and trust in the study team influenced participants' understanding. Barriers included logistics and lack of familial support. Important motivational drivers and barriers to participation in research by young adults with T1D must be considered to increase research engagement and facilitate the discovery of new knowledge.

摘要

了解患者参与糖尿病研究的动机驱动因素和障碍对于确保研究具有相关性和价值至关重要。1型糖尿病(T1D)的年轻成年人完成了一项包含31个问题的定性调查,评估参与者的经历、理解以及参与研究的动机和障碍。共有35名年龄在19至28岁之间、60%为女性的参与者完成了该调查。激励因素包括个人利益、与研究团队的关系、好奇心、经济补偿、利他主义和怀旧情绪。年龄较大的参与者(>22岁)报告称对研究团队的信任程度更高(p = 0.02),并且他们与研究团队的关系对其参与决定产生了积极影响(p = 0.03)。经济补偿对受过高等教育的参与者是一个强大的激励因素(p = 0.02)。年龄、性别、教育水平以及对研究团队的信任影响了参与者的理解。障碍包括后勤问题和缺乏家庭支持。必须考虑1型糖尿病年轻成年人参与研究的重要动机驱动因素和障碍,以提高研究参与度并促进新知识的发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8335/9663656/198b59b96b8a/10.1177_23743735221138236-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8335/9663656/4a8e52d57534/10.1177_23743735221138236-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8335/9663656/254c51b85200/10.1177_23743735221138236-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8335/9663656/198b59b96b8a/10.1177_23743735221138236-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8335/9663656/4a8e52d57534/10.1177_23743735221138236-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8335/9663656/254c51b85200/10.1177_23743735221138236-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8335/9663656/198b59b96b8a/10.1177_23743735221138236-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the Motivational Drivers of Young Adults with Diabetes for Participation in Kidney Research.探索糖尿病青年成人参与肾脏研究的动机驱动因素。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Nov 13;9:23743735221138236. doi: 10.1177/23743735221138236. eCollection 2022.
2
Money-oriented risk-takers or deliberate decision-makers: a cross-sectional survey study of participants in controlled human infection trials.以金钱为导向的冒险者或深思熟虑的决策者:一项关于人体受控感染试验参与者的横断面调查研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 26;10(7):e033796. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033796.
3
An Administrator's Perspective on the Organization of Physical Activity for Older Adults in Long-Term Care Facilities.长期护理机构中老年人身体活动组织的管理者视角
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Jan;17(1):75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
4
Why do - or don't - patients with urinary tract infection participate in a clinical trial? A qualitative study in German family medicine.为什么患有尿路感染的患者参与或不参与临床试验?一项关于德国家庭医学的定性研究。
Ger Med Sci. 2015 Oct 14;13:Doc17. doi: 10.3205/000221. eCollection 2015.
5
Qualitative study of barriers to clinical trial retention in adults with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes.对近期诊断为1型糖尿病的成年人临床试验保留障碍的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 17;8(7):e022353. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022353.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Clinical research participation among aging adults enrolled in an Alzheimer's Disease Center research registry.参与阿尔茨海默病中心研究注册的老年人群的临床研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23(3):443-52. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-101536.
8
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
9
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
10
The Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on Glycemic Control for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM2): A Systematic Review.动机性访谈对2型糖尿病(DM2)成人患者血糖控制的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-17. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-246.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing the recruitment of diverse populations into pain research: findings from a qualitative study with underrepresented participants.影响不同人群参与疼痛研究招募的因素:来自一项针对代表性不足参与者的定性研究的结果。
Pain. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003641.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of novel glomerular filtration rate estimation equations in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes.评估新型肾小球滤过率估计方程在 1 型糖尿病青少年和年轻成人中的应用。
J Diabetes Complications. 2022 Jan;36(1):108081. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2021.108081. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
2
Reflecting on nostalgic, positive, and novel experiences increases state Openness.反思怀旧、积极和新颖的体验会增加状态开放性。
J Pers. 2021 Apr;89(2):258-275. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12580. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
3
Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators.
患者为什么参与研究?对心理社会障碍和促进因素的系统评价综述
Trials. 2020 Mar 12;21(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4197-3.
4
Preliminary development of a questionnaire measuring patient views of participation in clinical trials.一份衡量患者对参与临床试验看法的问卷的初步开发。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Oct 21;12(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4724-z.
5
What matters in clinical trial decision-making: a systematic review of interviews exploring cancer patients' experiences.临床试验决策中的关键因素:对探索癌症患者经历的访谈进行的系统评价
Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Jun;33(2):266-278. doi: 10.1111/scs.12637. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
6
Reducing attrition within clinical trials: The communication of retention and withdrawal within patient information leaflets.减少临床试验中的脱落率:在患者知情同意书中沟通保留和退出情况。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0204886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204886. eCollection 2018.
7
Exploring the motivations of patients with type 2 diabetes to participate in clinical trials: a qualitative analysis.探索2型糖尿病患者参与临床试验的动机:一项定性分析。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Dec 12;2:34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0050-y. eCollection 2016.
8
Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (Can-SOLVE CKD): Form and Function.加拿大寻求克服慢性肾病的解决方案与创新(加拿大慢性肾病解决方案与创新项目:形态与功能)
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018 Jan 17;5:2054358117749530. doi: 10.1177/2054358117749530. eCollection 2018.
9
A Multicenter Investigation of Factors Influencing Women's Participation in Clinical Trials.多中心影响女性参与临床试验因素的调查。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Mar;27(3):258-270. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6458. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
10
Type 1 diabetes incidence and prevalence trends in a cohort of Canadian children and youth.1 型糖尿病在加拿大儿童和青少年队列中的发病率和流行趋势。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 May;19(3):501-505. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12566. Epub 2017 Aug 31.